St. Leonards Hospital, Nuttall Street, London, UK.
Br Dent J. 2013 May;214(9):E25. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.434.
Clinical audit is part of the NHS clinical governance framework for dentistry and is recommended as a quality improvement process for patient care, yet there is very mixed evidence supporting audit's ability to produce change in practice. Findings show evidence of changes following audit which improved patient care and practice efficiency. However, there is a general lack of dissemination of audit results, little useful feedback provided to participants, limited use of formal re-auditing of a particular topic and little reported on whether audit improves outcomes for patients. As part of its clinical governance responsibility, the Community Dental Service (CDS) is committed to ensuring that its clinical audit is robust, strategic and measures patient outcomes in its evaluation. The aim of this paper is to present a complete endodontic audit cycle; its recommendations and effects on the process and on outcomes of clinical patient endodontic care; and to evaluate if audit was a useful tool in this case.
临床审核是国民保健制度(NHS)牙科临床治理框架的一部分,被推荐作为改善患者护理质量的改进过程,然而,支持审核能够改变实践的证据非常混杂。研究结果表明,审核后改善了患者护理和实践效率的变化证据。然而,审核结果的传播普遍不足,向参与者提供的有用反馈很少,对特定主题的正式重新审核使用有限,并且很少报告审核是否改善了患者的结果。作为其临床治理责任的一部分,社区牙科服务(CDS)致力于确保其临床审核具有稳健性、战略性,并在评估中衡量患者的结果。本文的目的是展示一个完整的牙髓病学审核周期;其建议以及对临床患者牙髓病学护理过程和结果的影响;并评估在这种情况下审核是否是一种有用的工具。