Latour-Pérez J
Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Elche, Alicante, España.
Med Intensiva. 2013 Aug-Sep;37(6):409-15. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 May 8.
The third edition of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines opens the door to the use of albumin for fluid resuscitation in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. This recommendation is based on a recent meta-analysis that included studies with evidence of insufficient plasma expansion in the control group and studies performed in children with malaria with clear statistical heterogeneity (P for interaction=.02). After excluding pediatric studies, the confidence interval of the effect estimate was consistent with a mortality excess in the group treated with albumin (OR=.87 [95%CI: .71 to 1.07]). Two new randomized studies reported after publication of the meta-analysis found no benefit in patients treated with albumin. Given the uncertainty about the true effect of albumin (due to the existence of indirectness and imprecision) and its cost considerations, it is suggested not to use albumin in the initial resuscitation of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock (GRADE2C).
《拯救脓毒症运动指南》第三版为在严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者中使用白蛋白进行液体复苏打开了大门。这一建议基于最近的一项荟萃分析,该分析纳入了对照组血浆扩容不足证据的研究以及在疟疾患儿中进行的具有明显统计学异质性的研究(交互作用P值 = 0.02)。排除儿科研究后,效应估计的置信区间与白蛋白治疗组的死亡率增加一致(OR = 0.87 [95%CI: 0.71至1.07])。荟萃分析发表后报道的两项新的随机研究发现,白蛋白治疗的患者没有获益。鉴于白蛋白真实效果的不确定性(由于存在间接性和不精确性)及其成本考虑,建议在严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的初始复苏中不使用白蛋白(证据等级2C)。