Department of Pharmacy, Zhu-Jiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013 Aug;101(2):99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.03.033. Epub 2013 May 9.
To compare the efficacy and safety of daily lipoic acid (300-600 mg i.v.) plus methylcobalamin (500-1000 mg i.v. or im.) (LA-MC) with that of methylcobalamin alone (MC) on diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).
Electronic database were searched for studies published up to November 1, 2012 and study quality was assessed in duplicate. A random or a fixed effect model was used to analyse outcomes which were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) or mean difference (MD). I(2) statistic was used to assess heterogeneity.
Seventeen studies were included. Combined data from all studies showed that the LA-MC combination therapy was significantly superior to MC monotherapy (RR=1.47; 95% CI: 1.37-1.58). Superiority of the LA-MC combination was shown in nerve conduction velocity (NCV) with WMDs of 6.89 (95% CI: 4.24-9.73) for median motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV), 5.24 (4.14-6.34) for median sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), 4.34 (3.03-5.64) for peroneal MNCV, and 4.53 (3.2-5.85) for peroneal SNCV. There were no serious adverse events associated with treatment.
The results of the meta-analysis show that treatment with LA-MC for 2-4 weeks is associated with better outcomes in NCV and neuropathic symptoms relative to MC treatment. However larger well-designed studies are required to confirm this conclusion.
比较每日硫辛酸(300-600mg 静脉内)加甲钴胺(500-1000mg 静脉内或肌内)(LA-MC)与甲钴胺单独治疗(MC)对糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)的疗效和安全性。
检索截至 2012 年 11 月 1 日发表的研究,并对研究质量进行重复评估。使用随机或固定效应模型分析结果,结果表示为风险比(RR)或均数差(MD)。使用 I(2)统计量评估异质性。
纳入了 17 项研究。综合所有研究的数据表明,LA-MC 联合治疗明显优于 MC 单药治疗(RR=1.47;95%CI:1.37-1.58)。LA-MC 联合治疗在神经传导速度(NCV)方面具有优越性,其均数差值(MD)分别为 6.89(95%CI:4.24-9.73)、5.24(4.14-6.34)、4.34(3.03-5.64)和 4.53(3.2-5.85),用于中值运动神经传导速度(MNCV)、中值感觉神经传导速度(SNCV)、腓总运动神经传导速度(MNCV)和腓总感觉神经传导速度(SNCV)。治疗中没有与治疗相关的严重不良事件。
荟萃分析的结果表明,与 MC 治疗相比,LA-MC 治疗 2-4 周与 NCV 和神经病变症状的改善相关。然而,需要更大的、设计良好的研究来证实这一结论。