• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哮喘学龄前儿童的用力呼气衰减:是否为成人类型?

Forced expiratory decay in asthmatic preschool children--is it adult type?

机构信息

The Edmond and Lili Safra Children's Hospital, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Affiliated with Sackler Medical School, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2013 Jul;107(7):975-80. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.03.012. Epub 2013 May 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2013.03.012
PMID:23664671
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The forced expiratory decay in healthy preschool children portrays a convex shape that differs from the linear decay in the older healthy population. The "adult-type" expiratory decay during airway obstruction is concave. The study objective was to determine if the expiratory decay in young asthmatic children is "adult-type".

METHODS

Among 245 children (age 3-7 yrs), 178 had asthma (asthmatics) and 67 were non-asthmatic (controls). The expiratory flow decay was inspected by FEF25-75/FVC ratio (=1.0 when linear). Values were compared to those of our formerly studied (n = 108) healthy children. A meaningful obstruction in FEF25-75/FVC ratio was defined as 2-zScores from healthy. A meaningful response to bronchodilators was related to non-asthmatics.

RESULTS

In healthy subjects FEF25-75/FVC ratio declined with age from 1.73 ± 0.17 to 1.28 ± 0.11. Non-asthmatics portrayed ratio values similar to those of healthy subjects. In asthmatics, 118/178 displayed a convex to linear expiratory decay (FEF25-75/FVC = 1.33 ± 0.22). Sixty/178 asthmatics portrayed concavity (FEF25-75/FVC-0.79 ± 0.16) that appeared when FEF50 was 43.4 ± 12%healthy. Concavity appearance was also age-dependent (30.4% of 3-4 y old and 59.1% of 6-7 y). Vital-Capacity decreased in either decays, forming a visually petit curve. Most asthmatic children respond to bronchodilators by a meaningful elevation in FEF25-75/FVC values and by a visual change in the shape of the curve. Other common spirometry indices also increased meaningfully.

CONCLUSION

Most asthmatic preschool children portray convex to linear expiratory decay with diminished vital-capacity, resulting in a visually smaller than healthy curve, with seemingly normal expiratory decay. These curves may be misinterpreted as "normal" or as "no-cooperation" and may lead to misinterpretation. In response to bronchodilators, FEF25-75/FVC value increases in asthmatics and the curve changes from concave to linear or from linear to convex contour.

摘要

背景

健康学龄前儿童的用力呼气衰减呈现出凸形,与老年健康人群的线性衰减不同。气道阻塞时的“成人型”呼气衰减为凹形。本研究旨在确定年轻哮喘儿童的呼气衰减是否为“成人型”。

方法

在 245 名儿童(3-7 岁)中,178 名为哮喘患儿(哮喘组),67 名非哮喘患儿(对照组)。通过 FEF25-75/FVC 比值(当线性时为 1.0)检查呼气流量衰减。将这些值与我们之前研究的 108 名健康儿童进行比较。将 FEF25-75/FVC 比值的有意义的阻塞定义为与健康儿童相比相差 2-z 个标准差。支气管扩张剂的有意义反应与非哮喘儿童有关。

结果

在健康受试者中,FEF25-75/FVC 比值随年龄从 1.73±0.17 下降至 1.28±0.11。非哮喘患儿的比值与健康受试者相似。在哮喘患儿中,118/178 显示出凸形到线性的呼气衰减(FEF25-75/FVC=1.33±0.22)。60/178 名哮喘患儿表现出凹形(FEF25-75/FVC-0.79±0.16),当 FEF50 为 43.4±12%健康时出现。凹形出现也与年龄相关(30.4%的 3-4 岁和 59.1%的 6-7 岁)。两种衰减均使肺活量降低,形成视觉上较小的曲线。大多数哮喘患儿通过 FEF25-75/FVC 值的有意义升高和曲线形状的视觉变化对支气管扩张剂有反应。其他常见的肺活量指数也有显著增加。

结论

大多数哮喘学龄前儿童表现出凸形到线性的呼气衰减,肺活量降低,导致曲线比健康曲线视觉上更小,呼气衰减看似正常。这些曲线可能被误解为“正常”或“不合作”,并可能导致误解。支气管扩张剂治疗后,哮喘患儿的 FEF25-75/FVC 值增加,曲线从凹形变为线性或从线性变为凸形。

相似文献

1
Forced expiratory decay in asthmatic preschool children--is it adult type?哮喘学龄前儿童的用力呼气衰减:是否为成人类型?
Respir Med. 2013 Jul;107(7):975-80. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.03.012. Epub 2013 May 8.
2
Pulmonary function in symptom-free asthmatics.无症状哮喘患者的肺功能
Singapore Med J. 1993 Dec;34(6):522-3.
3
FVC deterioration, airway obstruction determination, and life span in Ataxia telangiectasia.共济失调毛细血管扩张症中的用力肺活量恶化、气道阻塞判定及寿命
Respir Med. 2015 Jul;109(7):890-6. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2015.05.013. Epub 2015 May 21.
4
Spirometry in children with asthma and/or allergic rhinitis: comparison of FEF25-75% with the standard measures.哮喘和/或过敏性鼻炎患儿的肺量计检查:FEF25-75%与标准测量值的比较
Minerva Pediatr. 2019 Apr;71(2):103-109. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4946.16.04267-5. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
5
Reference ranges for shape indices of the flow-volume loop of healthy children.健康儿童流量-容积环形态指数的参考范围。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015 Oct;50(10):1017-24. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23112. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
6
Determining the time to maximal bronchodilator response in asthmatic children.确定哮喘儿童达到最大支气管扩张剂反应的时间。
J Asthma. 2009 Feb;46(1):25-9. doi: 10.1080/02770900802460555.
7
The role of computer games in measuring spirometry in healthy and "asthmatic" preschool children.电脑游戏在健康及“哮喘”学龄前儿童肺功能测定中的作用。
Chest. 2005 Sep;128(3):1146-55. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.3.1146.
8
Alternative functional criteria to assess airflow-limitation reversibility in asthma.评估哮喘气流受限可逆性的替代功能标准。
Rev Port Pneumol (2006). 2015 Mar-Apr;21(2):69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.rppnen.2014.08.002. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
9
Spirometry in the asthmatic child: is FEF25-75 a more sensitive test than FEV1/FVC?哮喘儿童的肺功能测定:用力呼气中期流速(FEF25-75)是否比第一秒用力呼气容积/用力肺活量(FEV1/FVC)更敏感?
Pediatr Pulmonol. 1993 Jul;16(1):19-22. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950160105.
10
Small airway impairment in moderate to severe asthmatics without significant proximal airway obstruction.无明显近端气道阻塞的中重度哮喘患者的小气道损伤
Respir Med. 2013 Nov;107(11):1667-74. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.08.009. Epub 2013 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
MMEF may predict significant BDR and future risk of exacerbations in asthmatic children with normal baseline FEV.最大呼气中期流速(MMEF)可能预测基线第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV)正常的哮喘儿童的显著支气管舒张反应(BDR)及未来急性加重风险。
Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol. 2022 Feb 15;14(1):33-47. eCollection 2022.
2
Assessment of Airway Bronchodilation by Spirometry Compared to Airway Obstruction in Young Children with Asthma.通过肺活量测定法评估哮喘幼儿气道支气管扩张与气道阻塞情况的比较。
Can Respir J. 2016;2016:5394876. doi: 10.1155/2016/5394876. Epub 2016 Jun 9.