Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Limerick, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul 15;188(2):141-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201208-1544CI.
Establishing the etiology of fibrosing interstitial lung disease (FILD) remains a clinical challenge. This is because many disorders resulting in lung fibrosis may be similar in their initial clinical and radiographic appearances. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) studies are now almost always obtained for patients who present with otherwise nonspecific clinical symptoms and chest radiographic findings. In the majority of cases presenting with FILD, differential diagnosis typically requires differentiating among three most commonly encountered clinical entities: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with usual interstitial pneumonia, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. As a consequence, the development of a simplified diagnostic algorithmic approach initially focusing on the interpretation of HRCT findings may prove of considerable value provided thorough familiarity with optimal HRCT techniques and methods of interpretation. For this purpose, in patients with FILD in whom an underlying etiology is not initially apparent, the recently proposed American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society/Japanese Respiratory Society/Latin American Thoracic Association guidelines for the diagnosis of IPF have been modified to create a straightforward, clinically practicable algorithmic approach to clinical management based on the initial interpretation and classification of HRCT findings.
确定纤维化性间质性肺疾病(FILD)的病因仍然是一个临床挑战。这是因为许多导致肺纤维化的疾病在其最初的临床和影像学表现上可能相似。对于出现非特异性临床症状和胸部 X 线表现的患者,现在几乎总是进行高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)研究。在大多数出现 FILD 的病例中,鉴别诊断通常需要区分三种最常见的临床实体:特发性肺纤维化伴寻常性间质性肺炎、非特异性间质性肺炎和慢性过敏性肺炎。因此,最初专注于解释 HRCT 结果的简化诊断算法方法的发展可能具有相当大的价值,前提是对最佳 HRCT 技术和解释方法有充分的了解。为此,在最初没有明显病因的 FILD 患者中,对最近提出的美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会/日本呼吸学会/拉丁美洲胸科协会 IPF 诊断指南进行了修改,以根据 HRCT 结果的初始解释和分类创建一种简单、临床可行的临床管理算法方法。