Suppr超能文献

一项针对血友病患者的调查,旨在了解他们如何在家中追踪所用产品。

A survey of patients with haemophilia to understand how they track product used at home.

机构信息

Health Research Methodology Program, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Haemophilia. 2013 Sep;19(5):e289-95. doi: 10.1111/hae.12170. Epub 2013 May 15.

Abstract

Record keeping among individuals who manage haemophilia at home is an essential tool of communication between patient and Haemophilia Treatment Center (HTC). Complete records help HTCs monitor patients, their use of factor and ensure treatment is optimal. HTCs provide patients with a number of methods to track infusion practices. The study objectives were to: [1] determine the current methods of record keeping; [2] identify previous methods of record keeping; [3] understand the strengths and weaknesses associated with each method; and [4] gather suggestions for improvement. Survey methods were used to address the research objectives. Of the 83 patients in the Hamilton-Niagara region who received the survey distributed through the local HTC, 51 returned surveys were included into the analysis. Descriptive statistics were used. Results indicate individuals with haemophilia record infusion practices using: paper diaries, excel spreadsheets, hand-held PDAs and/or the online EZ-Log Web Client. The most popular method of record keeping was EZ-Log (45.1%) followed by paper diaries (35.2%). Advantages to using paper methods include the visual tracking of information and retaining hardcopies. The disadvantage was the inconvenience of physically submitting the records monthly. Advantages to using the online EZ-Log Web Client included ease of use and improved accuracy. The primary disadvantage was technical errors that were difficult to troubleshoot. Record keeping practices among individuals with haemophilia seem to vary according to personal preference and convenience. Respondents suggested that saving infusion history, incorporating barcode scanners or a copy and paste function could improve electronic methods.

摘要

患者在家中管理血友病时的记录保存是患者与血友病治疗中心(HTC)之间沟通的重要工具。完整的记录有助于 HTC 监测患者、他们对因子的使用情况,并确保治疗效果最佳。HTC 为患者提供了多种跟踪输注实践的方法。本研究的目的是:[1]确定当前的记录保存方法;[2]确定以前的记录保存方法;[3]了解每种方法的优缺点;[4]收集改进建议。调查方法用于解决研究目标。在通过当地 HTC 分发的汉密尔顿-尼亚加拉地区的 83 名患者中,有 51 名患者返回了调查,将这些调查纳入了分析。使用描述性统计方法。结果表明,血友病患者使用以下方法记录输注实践:纸质日记、Excel 电子表格、掌上 PDAs 和/或在线 EZ-Log Web 客户端。最受欢迎的记录保存方法是 EZ-Log(45.1%),其次是纸质日记(35.2%)。使用纸质方法的优点包括信息的可视化跟踪和保留硬拷贝。缺点是每月提交记录不太方便。使用在线 EZ-Log Web 客户端的优点包括易用性和提高准确性。主要缺点是技术错误难以解决。血友病患者的记录保存方法似乎因个人喜好和方便程度而异。受访者建议,保存输注历史记录、合并条形码扫描器或复制粘贴功能可以改进电子方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验