• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

近期急性冠状动脉综合征患者中低剂量口服因子 Xa 抑制剂:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Low-dose of oral factor Xa inhibitors in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.

出版信息

Atherosclerosis. 2013 Aug;229(2):482-8. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.04.022. Epub 2013 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.04.022
PMID:23672879
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that therapy with new oral activated factor X (Xa) inhibitors in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) yielded a reduction of ischemic events. However, this therapy was associated with a dose-related increase in major bleeding complications. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to appraise the clinical efficacy and safety of the lowest doses of oral factor Xa inhibitors compared with placebo in patients after a recent ACS.

METHODS

The primary endpoint was cardiovascular mortality. The rate of new myocardial infarction (MI) was the secondary efficacy endpoint, whereas major bleeding complications were recorded as a safety endpoint. Five RCTs were included in the meta-analysis enrolling a total of 25,643 patients.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in mortality between patients treated with new antithrombotics compared with those receiving the standard therapy: odds ratio (OR), [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 0.97 [0.72-1.31], p = 0.86. Recurrent MI rates were decreased in the anti-Xa group: OR [95%CI] = 0.86 [0.76-0.98], p = 0.02, number needed to treat (NNT) = 189. The administration of new oral anticoagulants was associated with a strongly increased risk of major bleedings compared with the standard treatment: OR [95%CI] = 3.24 [2.29-4.59], p < 0.001, number needed to harm (NNH) = 104; similarly, intracranial bleeding rates were significantly higher in the anti-Xa arm.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of the new oral anticoagulants on top of standard therapy in the setting of ACS results in an excessive risk of major bleedings without any clear evidence of outweighing clinical benefits.

摘要

背景

最近,随机对照试验(RCT)表明,新型口服激活因子 X(Xa)抑制剂治疗急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)可降低缺血事件的发生。然而,这种治疗与剂量相关的大出血并发症增加有关。我们旨在进行系统评价和荟萃分析,评估最近 ACS 后使用最低剂量口服 Xa 抑制剂与安慰剂相比的临床疗效和安全性。

方法

主要终点是心血管死亡率。新发心肌梗死(MI)发生率为次要疗效终点,而大出血并发症则作为安全性终点记录。荟萃分析纳入了 5 项 RCT,共纳入 25643 名患者。

结果

与接受标准治疗的患者相比,使用新型抗血栓药物治疗的患者死亡率无显著差异:比值比(OR)[95%置信区间(CI)] = 0.97 [0.72-1.31],p = 0.86。抗 Xa 组的复发性 MI 发生率降低:OR [95%CI] = 0.86 [0.76-0.98],p = 0.02,需要治疗的人数(NNT)= 189。与标准治疗相比,新型口服抗凝剂的应用与大出血风险显著增加相关:OR [95%CI] = 3.24 [2.29-4.59],p < 0.001,需要伤害的人数(NNH)= 104;同样,抗 Xa 组颅内出血发生率也显著升高。

结论

在 ACS 患者中,在标准治疗的基础上加用新型口服抗凝剂会导致大出血的风险过高,而没有明显证据表明临床获益超过风险。

相似文献

1
Low-dose of oral factor Xa inhibitors in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.近期急性冠状动脉综合征患者中低剂量口服因子 Xa 抑制剂:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Atherosclerosis. 2013 Aug;229(2):482-8. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.04.022. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
2
Factor Xa inhibitors versus vitamin K antagonists for preventing cerebral or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation.在心房颤动患者中,Xa因子抑制剂与维生素K拮抗剂预防脑栓塞或全身性栓塞的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 8(8):CD008980. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008980.pub2.
3
Oral direct thrombin inhibitors or oral factor Xa inhibitors versus conventional anticoagulants for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis.口服直接凝血酶抑制剂或口服因子 Xa 抑制剂与传统抗凝剂治疗深静脉血栓形成的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 14;4(4):CD010956. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010956.pub3.
4
New oral anticoagulants in addition to single or dual antiplatelet therapy after an acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.新型口服抗凝药物联合或不联合抗血小板治疗急性冠脉综合征:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2013 Jun;34(22):1670-80. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht049. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
5
Oral direct thrombin inhibitors or oral factor Xa inhibitors for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis.用于治疗深静脉血栓形成的口服直接凝血酶抑制剂或口服Xa因子抑制剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 30(6):CD010956. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010956.pub2.
6
Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): a network meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后使用非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药(NOACs):一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 24;2(2):CD013745. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013745.pub2.
7
Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for acute coronary syndrome.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架治疗急性冠状动脉综合征的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 23;8(8):CD012481. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012481.pub2.
8
Direct factor Xa inhibitors versus low molecular weight heparins or vitamin K antagonists for prevention of venous thromboembolism in elective primary hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair.在择期初次髋关节或膝关节置换术或髋部骨折修复中,直接凝血因子Xa抑制剂与低分子量肝素或维生素K拮抗剂用于预防静脉血栓栓塞的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 27;1(1):CD011762. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011762.pub2.
9
Oral direct thrombin inhibitors or oral factor Xa inhibitors versus conventional anticoagulants for the treatment of pulmonary embolism.口服直接凝血酶抑制剂或口服因子 Xa 抑制剂与传统抗凝剂治疗肺栓塞的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 14;4(4):CD010957. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010957.pub3.
10
Use of new-generation oral anticoagulant agents in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy after an acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.急性冠状动脉综合征后接受抗血小板治疗患者中新一代口服抗凝剂的应用:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Nov 12;172(20):1537-45. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.4026.

引用本文的文献

1
Dual-pathway Inhibition with Low-dose Aspirin and Rivaroxaban versus Aspirin Monotherapy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Peripheral Artery Disease: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis.低剂量阿司匹林与利伐沙班双途径抑制对比阿司匹林单药治疗冠心病和外周动脉疾病患者:系统文献综述与荟萃分析
Eur Cardiol. 2023 Apr 5;19:e01. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2023.40. eCollection 2024.
2
Low Dose Rivaroxaban for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.低剂量利伐沙班用于动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Feb 8;11:608247. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.608247. eCollection 2020.