• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于基因、肿瘤表型、临床特征和传统危险因素的个体化乳腺癌筛查。

Individually tailored screening of breast cancer with genes, tumour phenotypes, clinical attributes, and conventional risk factors.

机构信息

Graduate Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, 5F. No. 17, Hsu Chow Road, Zhongzheng District, Taipei City 100, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2013 Jun 11;108(11):2241-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.202. Epub 2013 May 14.

DOI:10.1038/bjc.2013.202
PMID:23674086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3681026/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We demonstrated how to comprehensively translate the existing and updated scientific evidence on genomic discovery, tumour phenotype, clinical features, and conventional risk factors in association with breast cancer to facilitate individually tailored screening for breast cancer.

METHODS

We proposed an individual-risk-score-based approach that translates state-of-the-art scientific evidence into the initiators and promoters affecting onset and subsequent progression of breast tumour underpinning a novel multi-variable three-state temporal natural history model. We applied such a quantitative approach to a population-based Taiwanese women periodical screening cohort.

RESULTS

Risk prediction for pre-clinical detectable and clinical-detected breast cancer was made by the two risk scores to stratify the underlying population to assess the optimal age to begin screening and the inter-screening interval for each category and to ascertain which high-risk group requires an alternative image technique. The risk-score-based approach significantly reduced the interval cancer rate as a percentage of the expected rate in the absence of screening by 30% and also reduced 8.2% false positive cases compared with triennial universal screening.

CONCLUSION

We developed a novel quantitative approach following the principle of translational research to provide a roadmap with state-of-the-art genomic discovery and clinical parameters to facilitate individually tailored breast cancer screening.

摘要

背景

我们展示了如何全面地将现有的和更新的关于基因组发现、肿瘤表型、临床特征和与乳腺癌相关的传统风险因素的科学证据转化为个体定制的乳腺癌筛查,以促进个体定制的乳腺癌筛查。

方法

我们提出了一种基于个体风险评分的方法,将最先进的科学证据转化为影响乳腺癌肿瘤发生和随后进展的启动子和促进剂,为新型多变量三状态时间自然史模型提供了基础。我们将这种定量方法应用于基于人群的台湾妇女定期筛查队列。

结果

通过两个风险评分对临床前可检测和临床可检测的乳腺癌进行风险预测,对潜在人群进行分层,以评估开始筛查的最佳年龄和每个类别之间的筛查间隔,并确定哪个高风险组需要替代成像技术。基于风险评分的方法显著降低了间隔期癌症率,与三年一次的普遍筛查相比,间隔期癌症率降低了 30%,假阳性病例也减少了 8.2%。

结论

我们遵循转化研究的原则,开发了一种新的定量方法,为提供最先进的基因组发现和临床参数的个体化乳腺癌筛查提供了路线图。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5346/3681026/03db83d644e0/bjc2013202f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5346/3681026/8024704dd359/bjc2013202f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5346/3681026/c6b797db8dcf/bjc2013202f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5346/3681026/03db83d644e0/bjc2013202f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5346/3681026/8024704dd359/bjc2013202f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5346/3681026/c6b797db8dcf/bjc2013202f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5346/3681026/03db83d644e0/bjc2013202f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Individually tailored screening of breast cancer with genes, tumour phenotypes, clinical attributes, and conventional risk factors.基于基因、肿瘤表型、临床特征和传统危险因素的个体化乳腺癌筛查。
Br J Cancer. 2013 Jun 11;108(11):2241-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.202. Epub 2013 May 14.
2
Initiators and promoters for the occurrence of screen-detected breast cancer and the progression to clinically-detected interval breast cancer.筛查发现的乳腺癌发生及进展为临床发现的间期乳腺癌的起始因素和促进因素。
J Epidemiol. 2017 Mar;27(3):98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.je.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
3
Risk assessment of multistate progression of breast tumor with state-dependent genetic and environmental covariates.具有状态依赖型遗传和环境协变量的乳腺肿瘤多状态进展的风险评估
Risk Anal. 2014 Feb;34(2):367-79. doi: 10.1111/risa.12116. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
4
The limits of personalization in precision medicine: Polygenic risk scores and racial categorization in a precision breast cancer screening trial.精准医学中的个体化限制:精准乳腺癌筛查试验中的多基因风险评分和种族分类。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 29;16(10):e0258571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258571. eCollection 2021.
5
Prospective validation of the NCI Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (Gail Model) on 40,000 Australian women.40000 名澳大利亚女性的 NCI 乳腺癌风险评估工具( Gail 模型)前瞻性验证。
Breast Cancer Res. 2018 Dec 20;20(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s13058-018-1084-x.
6
The ANDROMEDA prospective cohort study: predictive value of combined criteria to tailor breast cancer screening and new opportunities from circulating markers: study protocol.ANDROMEDA 前瞻性队列研究:联合标准预测乳腺癌筛查的价值及循环标志物带来的新机遇:研究方案。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Nov 22;17(1):785. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3784-5.
7
[Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].[定制乳房筛查试验(TBST)]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Jul-Oct;37(4-5):317-27.
8
Screening MRI in Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer.对有乳腺癌个人病史的女性进行 MRI 筛查。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Jan 7;108(3). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv349. Print 2016 Mar.
9
Added cancer yield of breast magnetic resonance imaging screening in women with a prior history of chest radiation therapy.既往胸部放疗史的女性中,乳房磁共振成像筛查的附加癌症检出率。
Cancer. 2013 Feb 1;119(3):495-503. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27771. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
10
Tailoring Breast Cancer Screening Intervals by Breast Density and Risk for Women Aged 50 Years or Older: Collaborative Modeling of Screening Outcomes.根据乳腺密度和风险调整50岁及以上女性的乳腺癌筛查间隔:筛查结果的协作建模
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Nov 15;165(10):700-712. doi: 10.7326/M16-0476. Epub 2016 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic Biomarkers Associated with Dynamic Transitions of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Infection-Precancerous-Cancer of Cervix for Navigating Precision Prevention.用于精准预防的与人类乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染-宫颈癌前病变-宫颈癌动态转变相关的遗传生物标志物
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jun 23;26(13):6016. doi: 10.3390/ijms26136016.
2
Multistate models for the natural history of cancer progression.癌症进展自然史的多状态模型。
Br J Cancer. 2022 Oct;127(7):1279-1288. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01904-5. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
3
Personalized breast cancer screening strategies: A systematic review and quality assessment.

本文引用的文献

1
Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial.前瞻性多中心队列研究,旨在为乳腺癌家族高风险女性的管理建议提供依据:EVA 试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 20;28(9):1450-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0839. Epub 2010 Feb 22.
2
Rethinking screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer.重新思考乳腺癌和前列腺癌的筛查
JAMA. 2009 Oct 21;302(15):1685-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1498.
3
The role of academic health science systems in the transformation of medicine.
个性化乳腺癌筛查策略:系统评价与质量评估。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 16;14(12):e0226352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226352. eCollection 2019.
4
Bayesian measurement-error-driven hidden Markov regression model for calibrating the effect of covariates on multistate outcomes: Application to androgenetic alopecia.贝叶斯测量误差驱动的隐马尔可夫回归模型用于校准协变量对多状态结局的影响:雄激素性脱发的应用。
Stat Med. 2018 Sep 20;37(21):3125-3146. doi: 10.1002/sim.7813. Epub 2018 May 21.
5
Assessment of the effects of decision aids about breast cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.乳腺癌筛查决策辅助工具效果评估:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 6;7(10):e016894. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016894.
6
Initiators and promoters for the occurrence of screen-detected breast cancer and the progression to clinically-detected interval breast cancer.筛查发现的乳腺癌发生及进展为临床发现的间期乳腺癌的起始因素和促进因素。
J Epidemiol. 2017 Mar;27(3):98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.je.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
7
Is mammography screening history a predictor of future breast cancer risk?乳腺 X 线筛查史能否预测未来乳腺癌风险?
Eur J Epidemiol. 2015 Feb;30(2):143-9. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9972-6. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
8
Metaplastic breast carcinomas - analysis of prognostic factors in a case series.化生性乳腺癌——一组病例的预后因素分析
Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2014;18(2):116-9. doi: 10.5114/wo.2014.41392. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
学术健康科学系统在医学变革中的作用。
Lancet. 2010 Mar 13;375(9718):949-53. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61082-5. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
4
Prevention of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: approaches to estimating and reducing risk.绝经后女性乳腺癌的预防:风险评估与降低风险的方法
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Mar 18;101(6):384-98. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp018. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
5
Emerging biomarkers and new understanding of traditional markers in personalized therapy for breast cancer.乳腺癌个性化治疗中新兴生物标志物及对传统标志物的新认识
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Dec 15;14(24):8019-26. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0974.
6
Cost-effectiveness of testing for breast cancer susceptibility genes.乳腺癌易感基因检测的成本效益分析。
Value Health. 2009 Mar-Apr;12(2):207-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00418.x. Epub 2008 Jul 18.
7
Polygenes, risk prediction, and targeted prevention of breast cancer.多基因、风险预测与乳腺癌的靶向预防
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 26;358(26):2796-803. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0708739.
8
Prognostic role of detection method and its relationship with tumor biomarkers in breast cancer: the university of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.检测方法在乳腺癌中的预后作用及其与肿瘤生物标志物的关系:德克萨斯大学MD安德森癌症中心的经验
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 May;17(5):1096-103. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0201.
9
Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.超声与乳腺X线摄影联合筛查与单纯乳腺X线摄影筛查对乳腺癌高危女性的效果比较
JAMA. 2008 May 14;299(18):2151-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.18.2151.
10
Mammographic density. Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence.乳腺钼靶密度。与乳腺钼靶密度相关的乳腺癌风险潜在机制:基于流行病学证据的假说。
Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(1):201. doi: 10.1186/bcr1831. Epub 2008 Jan 9.