Sint Maartens Clinic, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA, Ubbergen, The Netherlands,
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Mar;22(3):550-5. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2525-9. Epub 2013 May 16.
The posterior condylar offset (PCO) and the tibiofemoral contact point (CP) have been reported as important factors that can influence range of motion and clinical outcome after total knee arthroplasty. A mobile-bearing knee implant with an anterior posterior gliding insert would in theory be more sensitive for changes in PCO and CP. For this reason, we analysed the PCO and CP and the relation with outcome and range of motion in 132 patients from a prospectively documented cohort in this type of implant.
The prosthesis used was a posterior cruciate retaining AP gliding mobile-bearing total knee replacement (SAL II Sulzer Medica, Switzerland). In 132 knees, the pre- and postoperative PCO and postoperative CP were evaluated. Measurements were made on X-rays of the knee taken in approximately 90° of flexion and with less than 3-mm rotation of the femur condyles. The outcome parameters, range of motion (ROM) and the knee society score (KSS), for each knee were determined preoperatively and at 5-year follow-up.
The mean KSS improved from 91 to 161 at 5-year follow-up (p < 0.001) and the mean ROM from 102 to 108 (p < 0.05). The mean PCO difference (postoperative PCO-preoperative PCO) was--0.05 mm (SD 2.15). The CP was on average 53.9% (SD 5.5%). ROM was different between the 3 PCO groups (p = 0.05): patients with 3 or more mm decrease in PCO had the best postoperative ROM (p = 0.047). There was no statistical difference between the postoperative ROM between patients with a stable PCO and those with an increased PCO. There was no correlation between the difference in PCO and the difference in ROM; R Pearson = -0.056. There was no difference in postoperative ROM or postoperative total KSS between CP <60% and CP >60%: p = 0.22, p = 0.99, for ROM and KSS, respectively. Scatter plots showed uniform clouds of values: increase or decrease in PCO and CP had no significant influence on ROM or KSS.
The hypotheses that a stable PCO and a more natural CP increase postoperative ROM and improve clinical outcome could not be confirmed. On the contrary, a decreased PCO seemed to improve knee flexion. Furthermore, a relationship between PCO and CP could not be found.
Prospective cohort study, Level II.
后髁偏心距(PCO)和胫股接触点(CP)已被报道为影响全膝关节置换术后关节活动度和临床结果的重要因素。理论上,具有前后滑动插入物的活动平台膝关节假体对于 PCO 和 CP 的变化更敏感。出于这个原因,我们分析了 132 例前瞻性记录队列中这种植入物的 PCO 和 CP 以及与结果和关节活动度的关系。
使用的假体是后交叉韧带保留的 AP 滑行活动平台全膝关节置换(SAL II Sulzer Medica,瑞士)。在 132 例膝关节中,评估了术前和术后 PCO 以及术后 CP。测量在膝关节屈曲约 90°且股骨髁旋转小于 3mm 的 X 射线片上进行。在术前和 5 年随访时确定了每个膝关节的预后参数,即关节活动度(ROM)和膝关节协会评分(KSS)。
5 年随访时 KSS 平均从 91 分提高到 161 分(p<0.001),ROM 平均从 102 分提高到 108 分(p<0.05)。平均 PCO 差值(术后 PCO-术前 PCO)为-0.05mm(SD 2.15)。CP 平均为 53.9%(SD 5.5%)。ROM 在 3 个 PCO 组之间存在差异(p=0.05):PCO 减少 3 个或更多毫米的患者术后 ROM 最佳(p=0.047)。在 PCO 稳定的患者和 PCO 增加的患者之间,术后 ROM 没有统计学差异。PCO 差值与 ROM 差值之间没有相关性;R Pearson=-0.056。CP<60%和 CP>60%的患者术后 ROM 或术后总 KSS 之间无差异:p=0.22,p=0.99,分别为 ROM 和 KSS。散点图显示了均匀的数值云:PCO 和 CP 的增加或减少对 ROM 或 KSS 没有显著影响。
稳定的 PCO 和更自然的 CP 增加术后 ROM 和改善临床结果的假设不能被证实。相反,PCO 的减少似乎改善了膝关节的屈曲度。此外,还没有发现 PCO 和 CP 之间的关系。
前瞻性队列研究,II 级。