Petzel Sue V, Vogel Rachel Isaksson, Bensend Tracy, Leininger Anna, Argenta Peter A, Geller Melissa A
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
J Genet Couns. 2013 Oct;22(5):662-73. doi: 10.1007/s10897-013-9598-y. Epub 2013 May 16.
Little is known about genetic service utilization and ovarian cancer. We identified the frequency and outcome of genetic counseling referral, predictors of referral, and referral uptake for ovarian cancer patients. Using pathology reports, we identified all epithelial ovarian cancer patients seen in a university gynecologic oncology clinic (1/04-8/06). Electronic medical records (EMR) were used to document genetic service referral, time from diagnosis-to-referral, point-in-treatment at referral, personal/family cancer history, demographics, and genetic test results. Groups were compared using chi-squared and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. The study population consisted of 376 women with ovarian cancer, 72 (19 %) of who were referred for genetic counseling/testing, primarily during surveillance. Of those referred, 42 (58 %) had personal or family genetic counseling and 34 (47 %) were ultimately tested or identified due to known family mutation. Family history and prior cancer were associated with referral. Family history, living in a larger community, higher-stage disease, and serous histology were associated with undergoing genetic counseling. Risk assessment identified 20 BRCA1/2 (5.3 %) and 1 HNPCC (0.3 %) mutation carriers. Based on recent estimates that 11.7-16.6 % of women with ovarian cancer are BRCA carriers and 2 % are HNPCC carriers, results suggest under-identification of carriers and under-utilization of genetic services by providers and patients. Interventions to increase medical providers' referrals, even in a specialized oncology clinic, are necessary and may include innovations in educating these providers using web-based methods. Ease of referral by the introduction of an electronic cancer genetic referral form represents another new direction that may increase genetic risk assessment for high-risk women with ovarian cancer.
关于基因检测服务的利用情况与卵巢癌的关系,我们所知甚少。我们确定了卵巢癌患者的遗传咨询转诊频率及结果、转诊的预测因素以及转诊接受情况。利用病理报告,我们确定了在一所大学妇科肿瘤诊所就诊的所有上皮性卵巢癌患者(2004年1月至2006年8月)。使用电子病历记录遗传检测服务转诊情况、从诊断到转诊的时间、转诊时的治疗阶段、个人/家族癌症病史、人口统计学信息以及基因检测结果。对于分类变量,使用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验进行组间比较;对于连续变量,使用t检验进行比较。研究人群包括376名卵巢癌女性患者,其中72名(19%)主要在监测期间被转诊接受遗传咨询/检测。在这些被转诊的患者中,42名(58%)接受了个人或家族遗传咨询,34名(47%)最终因已知的家族突变而接受检测或被确诊。家族病史和既往癌症与转诊相关。家族病史、居住在较大社区、疾病分期较高以及浆液性组织学类型与接受遗传咨询相关。风险评估确定了20名BRCA1/2突变携带者(5.3%)和1名遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC)突变携带者(0.3%)。根据最近的估计,11.7% - 16.6%的卵巢癌女性为BRCA携带者,2%为HNPCC携带者,研究结果表明,提供者和患者对携带者的识别不足以及对基因检测服务的利用不足。即使在专科肿瘤诊所,采取干预措施以增加医疗提供者的转诊也是必要的,这可能包括采用基于网络的方法对这些提供者进行教育创新。引入电子癌症基因转诊表以简化转诊流程是另一个新方向,这可能会增加对高危卵巢癌女性的基因风险评估。