Nomura Kazunori, Yoshida Munehito, Kawai Masaki, Okada Motohiro, Nakao Shin-ichi
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sumiya Orthopaedic Hospital, Wakayama, Japan.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2014 May;75(3):183-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1334491. Epub 2013 May 15.
Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) is still regarded as contraindicated for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation by many surgeons. Moreover, the presence of epidural scar tissue makes surgical manipulation difficult. To successfully remove the herniated disc in such cases, an open technique with a wide exposure may be required. We devised a new minimally invasive endoscopic approach, which is using a transosseous route. This is a retrospective review of a consecutive case series to examine the operative and clinical results of this new approach.
Fifty-seven patients who underwent surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation were divided into two groups based on the operative procedure. Thirty patients underwent microendoscopic transosseous discectomy (TD) and 27 underwent MED. We graded operative results and clinical outcomes using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score for low-back pain before surgery and 1 year after surgery and compared the scores of the two groups.
No conversion to open procedure was necessary in either group. The mean TD operative time was 89.2 minutes with a mean intraoperative blood loss of 16.5 mL. Mean MED operative time was 92.0 minutes with a mean blood loss of 19.3 mL. There were two dural tears in the MED group, and one tear was combined with a fracture of the inferior articular process. No dural tears occurred in the TD group. No patients in either group had experienced re-recurrence of lumbar disc herniation at the time of the last follow-up. The JOA score improved significantly after surgery in both groups (p < 0.001).
TD is a safe and effective surgical approach for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and clinical results compare favorably with MED.
许多外科医生仍认为显微内镜下椎间盘切除术(MED)不适用于复发性腰椎间盘突出症的治疗。此外,硬膜外瘢痕组织的存在使手术操作困难。为了在这类病例中成功摘除突出的椎间盘,可能需要采用广泛暴露的开放技术。我们设计了一种新的微创内镜入路,即经骨入路。这是一项对连续病例系列的回顾性研究,以检验这种新入路的手术及临床效果。
57例行复发性腰椎间盘突出症手术的患者根据手术方式分为两组。30例行显微内镜下经骨椎间盘切除术(TD),27例行MED。我们采用日本骨科协会(JOA)下腰痛评分对术前及术后1年的手术结果和临床疗效进行评分,并比较两组的评分。
两组均无需转为开放手术。TD组平均手术时间为89.2分钟,平均术中失血量为16.5毫升。MED组平均手术时间为92.0分钟,平均失血量为19.3毫升。MED组有2例硬膜撕裂,其中1例合并下关节突骨折。TD组未发生硬膜撕裂。两组在最后一次随访时均无腰椎间盘突出症复发。两组术后JOA评分均显著改善(p<0.001)。
TD是治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症的一种安全有效的手术方法。手术时间、术中失血量及临床效果与MED相比更具优势。