Eldehni Mohamed Tarek, Odudu Aghogho, McIntyre Christopher William
Division of Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Graduate Entry Medicine and Health, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Theor Biol Med Model. 2013 May 16;10:33. doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-10-33.
Haemodialysis is a form of renal replacement therapy used to treat patients with end stage renal failure. It is becoming more appreciated that haemodialysis patients exhibit higher rates of multiple end organ damage compared to the general population. There is also a strong emerging evidence that haemodialysis itself causes circulatory stress. We aimed at examining haemodynamic patterns during haemodialysis using a new model and test that model against a normal control.
We hypothesised that blood pressures generated by each heart beat constantly vary between local peaks and troughs (local extrema), the frequency and amplitude of which is regulated to maintain optimal organ perfusion. We also hypothesised that such model could reveal multiple haemodynamic aberrations during HD. Using a non-invasive cardiac output monitoring device (Finometer®) we compared various haemodynamic parameters using the above model between a haemodialysis patient during a dialysis session and an exercised normal control after comparison at rest.
Measurements yielded 29,751 data points for each haemodynamic parameter. Extrema points frequency of mean arterial blood pressure was higher in the HD subject compared to the normal control (0.761Hz IQR 0.5-0.818 vs 0.468Hz IQR 0.223-0.872, P < 0.0001). Similarly, extrema points frequency of systolic blood pressure was significantly higher in haemodialysis compared to normal. In contrary, the frequency of extrema points for TPR was higher in the normal control compared to HD (0.947 IQR 0.520-1.512 vs 0.845 IQR 0.730-1.569, P < 0.0001) with significantly higher amplitudes.
Haemodialysis patients potentially exhibit an aberrant haemodynamic behaviour characterised by higher extrema frequencies of mean arterial blood pressure and lower extrema frequencies of total peripheral resistance. This, in theory, could lead to higher variation in organ perfusion and may be detrimental to vulnerable vascular beds.
血液透析是一种用于治疗终末期肾衰竭患者的肾脏替代疗法。越来越多的人认识到,与普通人群相比,血液透析患者出现多器官终末损伤的几率更高。也有强有力的新证据表明,血液透析本身会导致循环应激。我们旨在使用一种新模型来检查血液透析期间的血流动力学模式,并将该模型与正常对照进行测试。
我们假设每次心跳产生的血压在局部峰值和谷值(局部极值)之间不断变化,其频率和幅度受到调节以维持最佳器官灌注。我们还假设这种模型可以揭示血液透析期间的多种血流动力学异常。使用无创心输出量监测设备(Finometer®),我们在透析过程中的血液透析患者与静息后运动的正常对照之间,使用上述模型比较了各种血流动力学参数。
每个血流动力学参数的测量产生了29,751个数据点。血液透析受试者平均动脉血压的极值频率高于正常对照(0.761Hz,四分位数间距0.5 - 0.818,而正常对照为0.468Hz,四分位数间距0.223 - 0.872,P < 0.0001)。同样,血液透析时收缩压的极值频率明显高于正常情况。相反,正常对照的总外周阻力极值频率高于血液透析患者(0.947,四分位数间距0.520 - 1.512,而血液透析患者为0.845,四分位数间距0.730 - 1.569,P < 0.0001),且幅度明显更高。
血液透析患者可能表现出异常的血流动力学行为,其特征是平均动脉血压的极值频率较高,而总外周阻力的极值频率较低。从理论上讲,这可能导致器官灌注的更高变化,并可能对脆弱的血管床有害。