Department of Psychology, University of California, P.O. Box 951563, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1563, USA.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 Oct;229(3):515-25. doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3135-4. Epub 2013 May 17.
Various dimensions of impulsivity have been linked to substance abuse and dependence, both as consequences of, and as predisposing factors to addiction. With respect to the latter, they may be quantitative indicators of liability for substance use disorders (SUD) and aid in determining underlying genetic influences. We have previously determined that inhibitory control over impulsive responding, as measured by a reversal learning task, is heritable and under substantial genetic control, however their role as explaining variables for aspects of SUD have not been well explored.
The aim of this study was to test for an association between genetically determined differences in inhibitory control and addiction-related phenotypes, such that phenotypes of poor inhibitory control would predict propensity for elevated operant drug-seeking and -taking behaviors.
Mice from BxD strains with either good reversal learning (GRL) or poor reversal learning (PRL) ability were tested for intravenous cocaine self-administration under FR1, FR2, and FR5 reinforcement schedules. Additionally, locomotor responses to experimenter-delivered cocaine were assessed.
Compared to GRL strains, PRL strains acquired self-administration behavior more rapidly and administered cocaine at greater rates under all schedules of reinforcement, without any differences in discrimination index. In addition, PRL mice also exhibited increased responding during time-out periods. PRL strains also showed larger locomotor responses to 10 or 20 mg/kg injections of cocaine.
These studies demonstrate that heritable strain differences in inhibitory control do influence drug self-administration, thus suggest that genetically driven impulsivity of this type may predispose susceptibility to drug abuse and addiction.
冲动的各个维度都与物质滥用和依赖有关,既是成瘾的后果,也是成瘾的诱发因素。就后者而言,它们可能是物质使用障碍(SUD)易感性的定量指标,并有助于确定潜在的遗传影响。我们之前已经确定,通过反转学习任务测量的冲动反应的抑制控制是可遗传的,并且受到大量遗传控制,但它们作为 SUD 各个方面的解释变量的作用尚未得到充分探索。
本研究的目的是测试遗传决定的抑制控制差异与成瘾相关表型之间的关联,即抑制控制不佳的表型是否可以预测对升高的操作性药物寻求和摄取行为的倾向。
用具有良好反转学习(GRL)或不良反转学习(PRL)能力的 BxD 品系的小鼠,在 FR1、FR2 和 FR5 强化时间表下进行静脉内可卡因自我给药测试。此外,还评估了对实验者给予可卡因的运动反应。
与 GRL 品系相比,PRL 品系在所有强化时间表下更快地获得自我给药行为,并以更高的速度给予可卡因,而辨别指数没有差异。此外,PRL 小鼠在暂停期间也表现出更多的反应。PRL 品系对 10 或 20mg/kg 可卡因注射的运动反应也更大。
这些研究表明,抑制控制的可遗传品系差异确实会影响药物自我给药,因此表明这种类型的遗传驱动冲动可能会导致药物滥用和成瘾的易感性。