Suppr超能文献

有意识的知识对有共病反社会人格障碍和无共病反社会人格障碍的物质滥用者的决策有不同的影响。

Conscious knowledge influences decision-making differently in substance abusers with and without co-morbid antisocial personality disorder.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Psychol. 2013 Aug;54(4):292-9. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12054. Epub 2013 May 20.

Abstract

Decision-making impairment, as measured by the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), is a consistent finding among individuals with substance use disorder (SUD). We studied how this impairment is influenced by co-morbid antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) and conscious knowledge of the task. Three groups were investigated: SUD individuals without co-morbid ASPD (n = 30), SUD individuals with co-morbid ASPD (n = 16), and healthy controls (n = 17). Both SUD and SUD+ASPD participants had poor overall IGT performance. A block-by-block analysis revealed that SUD participants exhibited slow but steady improvement across the IGT, whereas SUD+ASPD participants exhibited initial normal improvement, but dropped off during the last 40 trials. Conscious knowledge of the task was significantly correlated to performance for controls and SUD participants, but not for SUD+ASPD participants. Our findings suggest that decision-making proceeds differently in SUD and SUD+ASPD individuals due to differences in acquisition and application of conscious knowledge.

摘要

决策障碍,如在赌博任务(IGT)中所测量的,是物质使用障碍(SUD)个体中一致存在的发现。我们研究了这种障碍如何受到共病反社会人格障碍(ASPD)和对任务的意识知识的影响。研究了三组人群:无共病 ASPD 的 SUD 个体(n = 30)、有共病 ASPD 的 SUD 个体(n = 16)和健康对照组(n = 17)。SUD 和 SUD+ASPD 参与者的整体 IGT 表现均不佳。分块分析显示,SUD 参与者在 IGT 中表现出缓慢但稳定的改善,而 SUD+ASPD 参与者最初表现出正常的改善,但在最后 40 次试验中下降。对任务的意识知识与对照组和 SUD 参与者的表现显著相关,但与 SUD+ASPD 参与者无关。我们的发现表明,由于意识知识的获取和应用方式不同,SUD 和 SUD+ASPD 个体的决策过程不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验