Farrell Simon, Oberauer Klaus
a School of Experimental Psychology , University of Bristol , Bristol , UK.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(1):33-44. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.795177. Epub 2013 May 20.
How is information from different content domains bound together into a representation of the whole sequence? Several theories predict that mixing information from different domains specifically impairs the ordering of information from different domains, whereas ordering within domains might be enhanced. In contrast, domain-general models--in which items from different domains are simply assumed to be less confusable--predict that mixing items from different domains enhances ordering, as the list items will on average be less confusable. The results of an experiment showed an overall advantage for mixed over pure lists in ordering information, supporting the domain-general viewpoint. Simulations with a representative domain-general model--the start-end model of Henson [(1998). Short-term memory for serial order: The start-end model. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 73-137]--showed that the model gave a satisfactory account of the data. Together, the data and simulations lend evidence to the idea that a domain-general mechanism is responsible for ordering stimuli from different domains, and that domain-specific effects are attributable to the relative similarity of item representations.
来自不同内容领域的信息是如何结合在一起形成整个序列的表征的?有几种理论预测,混合来自不同领域的信息会特别损害来自不同领域的信息的排序,而各领域内的排序可能会得到增强。相比之下,领域通用模型(在这种模型中,不同领域的项目被简单地假定为较不易混淆)预测,混合来自不同领域的项目会增强排序,因为列表中的项目平均而言会较不易混淆。一项实验的结果表明,在信息排序方面,混合列表总体上优于纯列表,这支持了领域通用观点。用一个具有代表性的领域通用模型——亨森的起止模型[(1998年)。序列顺序的短期记忆:起止模型。《认知心理学》,36,73 - 137]进行的模拟表明,该模型对数据给出了令人满意的解释。数据和模拟共同为这样一种观点提供了证据,即一种领域通用机制负责对来自不同领域的刺激进行排序,并且领域特定效应可归因于项目表征的相对相似的项目表征。