Logie Robert H, Saito Satoru, Morita Aiko, Varma Samarth, Norris Dennis
Human Cognitive Neuroscience, Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh, EH16 6JF, UK.
Department of Cognitive Psychology in Education, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Mem Cognit. 2016 May;44(4):590-607. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0580-9.
We report three experiments in which participants performed written serial recall of visually presented verbal sequences with items varying in visual similarity. In Experiments 1 and 2 native speakers of Japanese recalled visually presented Japanese Kanji characters. In Experiment 3, native speakers of English recalled visually presented words. In all experiments, items varied in visual similarity and were controlled for phonological similarity. For Kanji and for English, performance on lists comprising visually similar items was overall poorer than for lists of visually distinct items across all serial positions. For mixed lists in which visually similar and visually distinct items alternated through the list, a clear "zig-zag" pattern appeared with better recall of the visually distinct items than for visually similar items. This is the first time that this zig-zag pattern has been shown for manipulations of visual similarity in serial-ordered recall. These data provide new evidence that retaining a sequence of visual codes relies on similar principles to those that govern the retention of a sequence of phonological codes. We further illustrate this by demonstrating that the data patterns can be readily simulated by at least one computational model of serial-ordered recall, the Primacy model (Page and Norris, Psychological Review, 105(4), 761-81, 1998). Together with previous evidence from neuropsychological studies and experimental studies with healthy adults, these results are interpreted as consistent with two domain-specific, limited-capacity, temporary memory systems for phonological material and for visual material, respectively, each of which uses similar processes that have evolved to be optimal for retention of serial order.
我们报告了三项实验,在这些实验中,参与者对视觉呈现的语言序列进行书面系列回忆,其中项目的视觉相似度各不相同。在实验1和实验2中,以日语为母语的人回忆视觉呈现的日文字符。在实验3中,以英语为母语的人回忆视觉呈现的单词。在所有实验中,项目的视觉相似度不同,并控制了语音相似度。对于汉字和英语,在所有系列位置上,由视觉相似项目组成的列表的表现总体上比视觉不同项目的列表要差。对于视觉相似和视觉不同项目在列表中交替出现的混合列表,出现了明显的“之字形”模式,即视觉不同项目的回忆比视觉相似项目更好。这是首次在系列顺序回忆中对视觉相似度的操作显示出这种之字形模式。这些数据提供了新的证据,表明保留视觉代码序列所依赖的原则与控制语音代码序列保留的原则相似。我们通过证明至少一种系列顺序回忆的计算模型——首要模型(佩奇和诺里斯,《心理学评论》,第105卷第4期,761 - 81页,1998年)能够轻松模拟数据模式,进一步说明了这一点。与先前来自神经心理学研究和健康成年人实验研究的证据一起,这些结果被解释为分别与用于语音材料和视觉材料的两个特定领域、容量有限的临时记忆系统一致,每个系统都使用了为保留系列顺序而进化到最优的相似过程。