• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[在线血液透析滤过:它真的更昂贵吗?]

[Online hemodiafiltration: is it really more expensive?].

作者信息

Lebourg Ludivine, Amato Sonia, Toledano Daniel, Petitclerc Thierry, Créput Caroline

机构信息

Centre d'hémodialyse Henri-Küntziger, AURA, 5, rue du Bessin, 75015 Paris, France.

出版信息

Nephrol Ther. 2013 Jul;9(4):209-14. doi: 10.1016/j.nephro.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 May 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.nephro.2013.03.010
PMID:23683402
Abstract

Online hemodiafiltration has been shown to have many benefits in terms of morbi-mortality and to increase middle weight molecules removal. However, this technique is supposed to have an additional cost which may be an obstacle to increase its development in hemodialysis centers. The aim of the study is to achieve an accurate pharmaco-economic evaluation for determining the real overcost of online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) in comparison with high flux hemodialysis (HF-HD) using standard priming. We have identified the additional costs related to the consumables and monitors and the additional costs imposed by the technique itself (water consumption and microbiological analysis). In the center, more than 28,000 sessions per year are performed with 70% in OL-HDF (90% post-dilution). The consumable overcost ranges from -2.55 to +3.35 euros per session depending on the monitor and on the HDF modality. The overcost of microbiological analysis is +1.1 euros per session. The theoretical additional water consumption is calculated from different dialysat flow rates and OL-HDF modality. Its ranges from +50.8L to +74.8L per session increasing the water overcost from +0.15 to +0.23 euros per session. This accurate evaluation shows that the cost difference of OL-HDF depends on monitor used and on the OL-HDF modality. In our center, it ranges from -1.29 to +4.58 euros per session.

摘要

在线血液透析滤过已被证明在疾病死亡率方面有诸多益处,并能增加中分子量分子的清除。然而,这项技术被认为会产生额外成本,这可能成为其在血液透析中心推广的障碍。本研究的目的是进行准确的药物经济学评估,以确定在线血液透析滤过(OL-HDF)与使用标准预充的高通量血液透析(HF-HD)相比的实际额外成本。我们确定了与耗材和监测器相关的额外成本以及该技术本身带来的额外成本(水消耗和微生物分析)。在该中心,每年进行超过28000次透析治疗,其中70%为OL-HDF(90%为后置稀释)。每次治疗的耗材额外成本在-2.55至+3.35欧元之间,具体取决于监测器和血液透析滤过模式。微生物分析的额外成本为每次治疗+1.1欧元。理论额外水消耗根据不同的透析液流速和OL-HDF模式计算得出。每次治疗的额外水消耗在+50.8升至+74.8升之间,使水的额外成本从每次治疗+0.15欧元增加到+0.23欧元。这一准确评估表明,OL-HDF的成本差异取决于所使用的监测器和OL-HDF模式。在我们中心,每次治疗的成本差异在-1.29至+4.58欧元之间。

相似文献

1
[Online hemodiafiltration: is it really more expensive?].[在线血液透析滤过:它真的更昂贵吗?]
Nephrol Ther. 2013 Jul;9(4):209-14. doi: 10.1016/j.nephro.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 May 15.
2
Cost comparison of online haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis.在线高通量血液透析滤过与血液透析的成本比较。
J Nephrol. 2012 Mar-Apr;25(2):192-7. doi: 10.5301/jn.5000046.
3
Comparison between on-line high-efficiency hemodiafiltration and conventional high-flux hemodialysis for polyclonal free light chain removal.在线高效血液透析滤过与传统高通量血液透析清除多克隆游离轻链的比较。
Blood Purif. 2014;37(2):93-8. doi: 10.1159/000357968. Epub 2014 Mar 1.
4
Reprocessing high-flux polysulfone dialyzers does not negatively impact solute removal in short-daily online hemodiafiltration.在短程每日在线血液透析滤过中,对高通量聚砜透析器进行再处理不会对溶质清除产生负面影响。
Hemodial Int. 2014 Apr;18(2):473-80. doi: 10.1111/hdi.12126. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
5
Albumin losses during hemodiafiltration: all dialyzers are not created equal - a case report.血液透析滤过过程中的白蛋白丢失:并非所有透析器都一样——一例报告。
BMC Nephrol. 2019 Oct 28;20(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s12882-019-1567-8.
6
[On-line sequential hemodiafiltration (HDF-OL-S): a new therapeutic option].[在线序贯血液透析滤过(HDF-OL-S):一种新的治疗选择]
Nefrologia. 2008;28(4):433-8.
7
The cost-utility of haemodiafiltration versus haemodialysis in the Convective Transport Study.血液透析滤过与血液透析在对流传输研究中的成本效用比较。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013 Jul;28(7):1865-73. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft045. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
8
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of High-Efficiency Hemodiafiltration Versus Low-Flux Hemodialysis Based on the Canadian Arm of the CONTRAST Study.基于CONTRAST研究加拿大分支的高效血液滤过与低通量血液透析的成本效益分析
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Dec;13(6):647-59. doi: 10.1007/s40258-015-0179-0.
9
Quantitative assessment of sodium mass removal using ionic dialysance and sodium gradient as a proxy tool: Comparison of high-flux hemodialysis versus online hemodiafiltration.使用离子透析和钠梯度作为替代工具定量评估钠质量去除:高通量血液透析与在线血液透析滤过的比较。
Artif Organs. 2021 Aug;45(8):E280-E292. doi: 10.1111/aor.13923. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
10
Osteocalcin and myoglobin removal in on-line hemodiafiltration versus low- and high-flux hemodialysis.在线血液透析滤过与低通量和高通量血液透析中骨钙素和肌红蛋白的清除情况
Am J Kidney Dis. 2002 Sep;40(3):582-9. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.34918.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Regular or Extended Hemodialysis and Hemodialfiltration on Plasma Oxalate Concentrations in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease.规律或延长血液透析及血液透析滤过对终末期肾病患者血浆草酸盐浓度的影响
Kidney Int Rep. 2017 Jun 8;2(6):1050-1058. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2017.06.002. eCollection 2017 Nov.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of online hemodiafiltration versus high-flux hemodialysis.在线血液透析滤过与高通量血液透析的成本效益分析。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 Sep 22;8:531-540. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S109649. eCollection 2016.
3
High convection volume in online post-dilution haemodiafiltration: relevance, safety and costs.
在线后稀释血液透析滤过中的高通量:相关性、安全性及成本
Clin Kidney J. 2015 Aug;8(4):368-73. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfv040. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
4
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of High-Efficiency Hemodiafiltration Versus Low-Flux Hemodialysis Based on the Canadian Arm of the CONTRAST Study.基于CONTRAST研究加拿大分支的高效血液滤过与低通量血液透析的成本效益分析
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Dec;13(6):647-59. doi: 10.1007/s40258-015-0179-0.