Suppr超能文献

药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架置入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的长期疗效:DEDICATION 试验(急性心肌梗死中药物洗脱和远端保护)的 5 年随访结果

Long-term outcome after drug-eluting versus bare-metal stent implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 5 years follow-up from the randomized DEDICATION trial (Drug Elution and Distal Protection in Acute Myocardial Infarction).

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jun;6(6):548-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.12.129. Epub 2013 May 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare the long-term effects of drug-eluting stent (DES) compared with bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND

The randomized DEDICATION (Drug Elution and Distal Protection in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial evaluated the outcome after DES compared with BMS implantation in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

METHODS

Patients with a high-grade stenosis/occlusion of a native coronary artery presenting with symptoms <12 h and ST-segment elevation were enrolled after giving informed consent. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a DES or a BMS in the infarct-related lesion. Patients were followed for at least 5 years, and clinical endpoints were evaluated from population registries and hospital charts. The main endpoint was the occurrence of the first major adverse cardiac event (MACE), defined as cardiac death, nonfatal recurrent myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization.

RESULTS

Complete clinical status was available in 623 patients (99.5%) at 5 years follow-up. The combined MACE rate was insignificantly lower in the DES group (16.9% vs. 23%), mainly driven by a lower need of repeat revascularization (p = 0.07). Whereas the number of deaths from all causes tended to be higher in the DES group (16.3% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.17), cardiac mortality was significantly higher (7.7% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.02). The 5-year stent thrombosis rates were generally low and similar between the DES and the BMS groups. No cardiac deaths occurring within 1 month could be clearly ascribed to stent thrombosis, whereas stent thrombosis was involved in 78% of later-occurring deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The 5-year MACE rate was insignificantly different, but the cardiac mortality was higher after DES versus BMS implantation in patients with STEMI. Stent thrombosis was the main cause of late cardiac deaths.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较药物洗脱支架(DES)与裸金属支架(BMS)植入治疗急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的长期效果。

背景

随机 DEDICATION(急性心肌梗死中药物洗脱和远端保护)试验评估了 STEMI 患者行直接 PCI 后 DES 与 BMS 植入的结局。

方法

患者签署知情同意书后,出现症状<12 小时且 ST 段抬高存在高分级狭窄/闭塞的情况下,入选本研究。患者被随机分配到梗死相关病变中接受 DES 或 BMS 治疗。患者随访至少 5 年,临床终点从人群登记和医院病历中评估。主要终点是首次主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的发生,定义为心脏性死亡、非致死性复发性心肌梗死和靶病变血运重建。

结果

5 年随访时,623 例患者(99.5%)的完整临床状态可用。DES 组的复合 MACE 发生率较低(16.9% vs. 23%),但主要是由于再次血运重建的需求降低(p=0.07)。DES 组的全因死亡率(16.3% vs. 12.1%)虽有增高趋势(p=0.17),但心脏死亡率显著增高(7.7% vs. 3.2%)(p=0.02)。5 年支架血栓形成率总体较低,DES 组与 BMS 组相似。无法明确 1 个月内发生的心脏性死亡归因于支架血栓形成,而支架血栓形成与之后发生的 78%死亡相关。

结论

DES 与 BMS 植入治疗 STEMI 患者 5 年 MACE 率无显著差异,但心脏死亡率更高。支架血栓形成是晚期心脏死亡的主要原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验