Suppr超能文献

接受替拉瑞韦为基础的三联疗法的慢性丙型肝炎患者的早期病毒动力学:两种实时 PCR 检测方法的比较。

Early phase viral kinetics of chronic hepatitis C patients receiving telaprevir-based triple therapy: a comparison of two real-time PCR assays.

机构信息

Department of General Internal Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Antiviral Res. 2013 Aug;99(2):119-24. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 May 14.

Abstract

Monitoring hepatitis C virus (HCV) kinetics during antiviral treatment is recommended for determining the best form of treatment management. We compared the measurement of HCV RNA by two Real-time PCR assays during the first 12weeks phase of telaprevir in combination with pegylated interferon α2b and ribavirin treatment for chronic hepatitis C patients. The viral kinetics of 65 patients with HCV genotype 1b was assessed. HCV RNA was tested at baseline, on day 3, and every week from 1 to 12 by both the first-generation Roche COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan® HCV (CAP/CTM) assay and the Abbott RealTime HCV (ART) assay. A total of 910 serum samples were obtained from the 65 patients. Of these, 168 (28.5%) of the 590 samples HCV RNA negative by CAP/CTM were positive by ART. In contrast, 17 (3.9%) of the 439 samples HCV RNA negative by ART were positive by CAP/CTM. The rates of HCV RNA negativity by ART at weeks 3, 4, and 5 were significantly lower than those by CAP/CTM (21.5% vs. 50.8%, 36.9% vs. 70.8% and 44.6% vs. 81.5%; P<0.001, P<0.0001 and P<0.05, respectively). Although the ART is superior for the determination of HCV RNA negativity, the predictive value of detectable HCV RNA for non-sustained virological response (non-SVR) by CAP/CTM is higher than by ART at weeks 4, 6, and 8. We also found that 16 (24.6%) by CAP/CTM and 28 (43.1%) by ART had a reappearance of residual HCV RNA during the telaprevir treatment period. However, the reappearance of residual HCV RNA was not associated with non-SVR. In conclusion, a significant difference was found between the two real-time PCR assays for the assessment of virological response based on undetectable HCV RNA.

摘要

监测抗病毒治疗期间的丙型肝炎病毒 (HCV) 动力学对于确定最佳治疗管理形式是推荐的。我们比较了两种实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测方法在替拉瑞韦联合聚乙二醇干扰素α2b 和利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者的前 12 周中的 HCV RNA 测量。评估了 65 例 HCV 基因型 1b 患者的病毒动力学。在基线时、第 3 天和第 1 至 12 周的每周都通过第一代罗氏 COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan® HCV(CAP/CTM)检测和雅培实时 HCV(ART)检测来检测 HCV RNA。从 65 例患者中获得了总共 910 个血清样本。其中,590 个样本经 CAP/CTM 检测 HCV RNA 阴性的 168 个(28.5%)样本经 ART 检测呈阳性。相比之下,439 个样本经 ART 检测 HCV RNA 阴性的 17 个(3.9%)样本经 CAP/CTM 检测呈阳性。ART 在第 3、4 和 5 周时 HCV RNA 阴性率显著低于 CAP/CTM(21.5%比 50.8%,36.9%比 70.8%和 44.6%比 81.5%;P<0.001,P<0.0001 和 P<0.05)。尽管 ART 更适合检测 HCV RNA 阴性,但在第 4、6 和 8 周时,CAP/CTM 检测可检测到的 HCV RNA 对非持续病毒学应答(non-SVR)的预测价值高于 ART。我们还发现,在替拉瑞韦治疗期间,CAP/CTM 检测的 16 例(24.6%)和 ART 检测的 28 例(43.1%)患者出现了残余 HCV RNA 的再次出现。然而,残余 HCV RNA 的再次出现与 non-SVR 无关。总之,在基于不可检测 HCV RNA 的病毒学应答评估方面,两种实时 PCR 检测方法之间存在显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验