• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分流评估中临床决策的认知过程:一个理论难题?

The cognitive processes underpinning clinical decision in triage assessment: a theoretical conundrum?

作者信息

Noon Amy J

机构信息

King's College Hospital Foundation Trust, Accident and Emergency Department, Denmark Hill, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int Emerg Nurs. 2014 Jan;22(1):40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 May 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.ienj.2013.01.003
PMID:23685041
Abstract

High quality clinical decision-making (CDM) has been highlighted as a priority across the nursing profession. Triage nurses, in the Accident and Emergency (A&E) department, work in considerable levels of uncertainty and require essential skills including: critical thinking, evaluation and decision-making. The content of this paper aims to promote awareness of how triage nurses make judgements and decisions in emergency situations. By exploring relevant literature on clinical judgement and decision-making theory, this paper demonstrates the importance of high quality decision-making skills underpinning the triage nurse's role. Having an awareness of how judgements and decisions are made is argued as essential, in a time where traditional nurse boundaries and responsibilities are never more challenged. It is hoped that the paper not only raises this awareness in general but also, in particular, engages the triage nurse to look more critically at how they make their own decisions in their everyday practice.

摘要

高质量的临床决策(CDM)已被视为整个护理行业的首要任务。急诊(A&E)部门的分诊护士工作时面临着极大的不确定性,需要具备包括批判性思维、评估和决策在内的基本技能。本文内容旨在提高人们对分诊护士在紧急情况下如何进行判断和决策的认识。通过探讨临床判断和决策理论的相关文献,本文证明了高质量决策技能对分诊护士角色的重要性。在传统护士的界限和职责从未像现在这样受到挑战的时代,了解判断和决策的方式被认为至关重要。希望本文不仅能提高人们的总体认识,特别是能促使分诊护士更批判性地审视他们在日常工作中如何做出自己的决策。

相似文献

1
The cognitive processes underpinning clinical decision in triage assessment: a theoretical conundrum?分流评估中临床决策的认知过程:一个理论难题?
Int Emerg Nurs. 2014 Jan;22(1):40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 May 17.
2
Explicating nurses' cardiac triage decisions.解读护士的心脏分诊决策。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009 Jan-Feb;24(1):50-7. doi: 10.1097/01.JCN.0000317474.50424.4f.
3
Why we do the things we do: applying clinical decision-making frameworks to triage practice.我们为何做我们所做之事:将临床决策框架应用于分诊实践。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 1999 Jan;7(1):50-7. doi: 10.1016/s0965-2302(99)80103-9.
4
Triage in the emergency department--a qualitative study of the factors which nurses consider when making decisions.急诊科的分诊——一项关于护士在做决策时所考虑因素的定性研究
Nurs Crit Care. 2006 May-Jun;11(3):136-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1362-1017.2006.00162.x.
5
Australian triage nurses' decision-making and scope of practice.澳大利亚分诊护士的决策制定与执业范围。
Aust J Adv Nurs. 2000 Sep-Nov;18(1):24-33.
6
Decision-making in A&E by expert nurses.急诊室中专家护士的决策制定。
Nurs Times. 1998;94(41):62-5.
7
Triage decision making: educational strategies.分诊决策:教育策略
Accid Emerg Nurs. 1999 Apr;7(2):106-11. doi: 10.1016/s0965-2302(99)80031-9.
8
An exploration of clinical decision making in mental health triage.精神科分诊中的临床决策研究
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2009 Aug;23(4):298-308. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
9
Walking in--initial visualisation and assessment at triage.进入——分诊时的初步观察与评估。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2007 Apr;15(2):73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2006.12.008. Epub 2007 Feb 23.
10
Reducing uncertainty in triaging mental health presentations: examining triage decision-making.减少心理健康就诊分流中的不确定性:审视分流决策制定。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2014 Jan;22(1):47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of Saudi National COVID-19 Preparedness Programs on Triage Decision-Making Skills of Healthcare Practitioners During the 2020 Peak of the 1st Wave of COVID-19.沙特阿拉伯国家新冠疫情防控计划对2020年第一波新冠疫情高峰期医护人员分诊决策技能的影响
Infect Drug Resist. 2022 Mar 8;15:925-932. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S347375. eCollection 2022.
2
Unlocking intuition and expertise: using interpretative phenomenological analysis to explore clinical decision making.开启直觉与专业技能:运用诠释现象学分析法探索临床决策
J Res Nurs. 2019 Mar;24(1-2):88-101. doi: 10.1177/1744987118809528. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
3
The use of a dedicated neurological triage system improves process times and resource utilization: a prospective observational study from an interdisciplinary emergency department.
使用专门的神经科分诊系统可改善流程时间和资源利用:一项来自跨学科急诊科的前瞻性观察研究。
Neurol Res Pract. 2019 Oct 25;1:29. doi: 10.1186/s42466-019-0036-y. eCollection 2019.
4
Implementation of a Standardized Initial Assessment for Demand Management in Outpatient Emergency Care in Germany: Early Qualitative Process Evaluation.德国门诊急诊护理需求管理标准化初始评估的实施:早期定性过程评估
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Sep 4;4(9):e18456. doi: 10.2196/18456.
5
Explaining challenges of obstetric triage structure: A qualitative study.阐述产科分诊结构的挑战:一项定性研究。
Nurs Open. 2020 Mar 18;7(4):1074-1080. doi: 10.1002/nop2.478. eCollection 2020 Jul.
6
Comparing Expert and Non-Expert Assessment of Patients Presenting with Neurological Symptoms to the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Observational Study.比较急诊科对出现神经系统症状患者的专家评估与非专家评估:一项回顾性观察研究。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020 Feb 13;16:447-456. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S236160. eCollection 2020.
7
The Quality of the Maternity Triage Process: a Qualitative Study.产科分诊流程的质量:一项定性研究。
Adv J Emerg Med. 2019 Oct 3;4(1):e6. doi: 10.22114/ajem.v0i0.242. eCollection 2020 Winter.