Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Jun;227(3):311-22. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3489-1. Epub 2013 May 18.
The exploration of a familiar object by hand can benefit its identification by eye. What is unclear is how much this multisensory cross-talk reflects shared shape representations versus generic semantic associations. Here, we compare several simultaneous priming conditions to isolate the potential contributions of shape and semantics in haptic-to-visual priming. Participants explored a familiar object manually (haptic prime) while trying to name a visual object that was gradually revealed in increments of spatial resolution. Shape priming was isolated in a comparison of identity priming (shared semantic category and shape) with category priming (same category, but different shapes). Semantic priming was indexed by the comparisons of category priming with unrelated haptic primes. The results showed that both factors mediated priming, but that their relative weights depended on the reliability of the visual information. Semantic priming dominated in Experiment 1, when participants were free to use high-resolution visual information, but shape priming played a stronger role in Experiment 2, when participants were forced to respond with less reliable visual information. These results support the structural description hypothesis of haptic-visual priming (Reales and Ballesteros in J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 25:644-663, 1999) and are also consistent with the optimal integration theory (Ernst and Banks in Nature 415:429-433, 2002), which proposes a close coupling between the reliability of sensory signals and their weight in decision making.
用手探索熟悉的物体可以有益于通过眼睛识别该物体。目前尚不清楚这种多感觉交叉对话在多大程度上反映了共同的形状表示与通用语义关联。在这里,我们比较了几种同时启动的条件,以分离触觉到视觉启动中形状和语义的潜在贡献。参与者手动探索熟悉的物体(触觉启动),同时试图命名一个视觉物体,该物体逐渐以空间分辨率的增量显示。在身份启动(共享语义类别和形状)与类别启动(相同类别,但形状不同)的比较中,分离了形状启动。语义启动通过类别启动与无关触觉启动的比较来索引。结果表明,这两个因素都介导了启动,但它们的相对权重取决于视觉信息的可靠性。在实验 1 中,当参与者可以自由使用高分辨率的视觉信息时,语义启动占主导地位,但在实验 2 中,当参与者被迫使用不太可靠的视觉信息时,形状启动则起着更强的作用。这些结果支持触觉-视觉启动的结构描述假说(Reales 和 Ballesteros 在 J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 25:644-663, 1999),也与最优整合理论(Ernst 和 Banks 在 Nature 415:429-433, 2002)一致,该理论提出了感官信号的可靠性与其在决策中的权重之间的紧密耦合。