Department of Gastroenterology and Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa 761-0796, Japan.
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 May 14;19(18):2752-60. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i18.2752.
To retrospectively review the results of over-the-scope clip (OTSC) use in our hospital and to examine the feasibility of using the OTSC to treat perforations after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).
We enrolled 23 patients who presented with gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, fistulae and perforations and were treated with OTSCs (Ovesco Endoscopy GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany) between November 2011 and September 2012. Maximum lesion size was defined as lesion diameter. The number of OTSCs to be used per patient was not decided until the lesion was completely closed. We used a twin grasper (Ovesco Endoscopy GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany) as a grasping device for all the patients. A 9 mm OTSC was chosen for use in the esophagus and colon, and a 10 mm device was used for the stomach, duodenum and rectum. The overall success rate and complications were evaluated, with a particular emphasis on patients who had undergone ESD due to adenocarcinoma. In technical successful cases we included not only complete closing by using OTSCs, but also partial closing where complete closure with OTSCs is almost difficult. In overall clinical successful cases we included only complete closing by using only OTSCs perfectly. All the OTSCs were placed by 2 experienced endoscopists. The sites closed after ESD included not only the perforation site but also all defective ulcers sites.
A total of 23 patients [mean age 77 years (range 64-98 years)] underwent OTSC placement during the study period. The indications for OTSC placement were GI bleeding (n = 9), perforation (n = 10), fistula (n = 4) and the prevention of post-ESD duodenal artificial ulcer perforation (n = 1). One patient had a perforation caused by a glycerin enema, after which a fistula formed. Lesion closure using the OTSC alone was successful in 19 out of 23 patients, and overall success rate was 82.6%. A large lesion size (greater than 20 mm) and a delayed diagnosis (more than 1 wk) were the major contributing factors for the overall unsuccessful clinical cases. The location of the unsuccessful lesion was in the stomach. The median operation time in the successful cases was 18 min, and the average observation time was 67 d. During the observation period, none of the patients experienced any complications associated with OTSC placement. In addition, we successfully used the OTSC to close the perforation site after ESD in 6 patients. This was a single-center, retrospective study with a small sample size.
The OTSC is effective for treating GI bleeding, fistulae as well as perforations, and the OTSC technique proofed effective treatment for perforation after ESD.
回顾我院使用内镜下全覆膜金属夹(OTSC)的结果,并探讨使用 OTSC 治疗内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)后穿孔的可行性。
我们纳入了 2011 年 11 月至 2012 年 9 月期间因胃肠道(GI)出血、瘘管和穿孔而接受 OTSC(德国图宾根 Ovesco 内镜公司)治疗的 23 例患者。最大病变大小定义为病变直径。直到病变完全闭合,才决定每个患者使用的 OTSC 数量。我们使用双抓钳(德国图宾根 Ovesco 内镜公司)作为所有患者的抓握装置。对于食管和结肠,使用 9mm 的 OTSC;对于胃、十二指肠和直肠,使用 10mm 的装置。评估总体成功率和并发症,特别关注因腺癌而行 ESD 的患者。在技术成功的病例中,我们不仅包括使用 OTSC 完全闭合,还包括使用 OTSC 几乎难以完全闭合的部分闭合。在总体临床成功的病例中,我们仅包括仅使用 OTSC 完全闭合的病例。所有的 OTSC 都是由 2 名经验丰富的内镜医生放置的。ESD 后闭合的部位不仅包括穿孔部位,还包括所有有缺陷的溃疡部位。
在研究期间,共有 23 例患者(平均年龄 77 岁[范围 64-98 岁])接受了 OTSC 放置。放置 OTSC 的指征为 GI 出血(n=9)、穿孔(n=10)、瘘管(n=4)和预防 ESD 后十二指肠人工溃疡穿孔(n=1)。1 例因甘油灌肠后发生穿孔,随后形成瘘管。23 例患者中,19 例单独使用 OTSC 成功闭合病变,总体成功率为 82.6%。大病变大小(大于 20mm)和延迟诊断(超过 1 周)是总体临床不成功病例的主要原因。不成功病变的位置在胃。成功病例的中位手术时间为 18 分钟,平均观察时间为 67 天。在观察期间,没有患者出现与 OTSC 放置相关的任何并发症。此外,我们还成功地用 OTSC 闭合了 6 例 ESD 后穿孔部位。这是一项单中心回顾性研究,样本量较小。
OTSC 治疗 GI 出血、瘘管和穿孔是有效的,OTSC 技术证明对 ESD 后穿孔的治疗有效。