Psychology, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Dec;39(6):1652-66. doi: 10.1037/a0032562. Epub 2013 May 20.
A sequence of constant-frequency tones can promote streaming in a subsequent sequence of alternating-frequency tones, but why this effect occurs is not fully understood and its time course has not been investigated. Experiment 1 used a 2.0-s-long constant-frequency inducer (10 repetitions of a low-frequency pure tone) to promote segregation in a subsequent, 1.2-s test sequence of alternating low- and high-frequency tones. Replacing the final inducer tone with silence substantially reduced reported test-sequence segregation. This reduction did not occur when either the 4th or 7th inducer was replaced with silence. This suggests that a change at the induction/test-sequence boundary actively resets build-up, rather than less segregation occurring simply because fewer inducer tones were presented. Furthermore, Experiment 2 found that a constant-frequency inducer produced its maximum segregation-promoting effect after only three tones--this contrasts with the more gradual build-up typically observed for alternating-frequency sequences. Experiment 3 required listeners to judge continuously the grouping of 20-s test sequences. Constant-frequency inducers were considerably more effective at promoting segregation than alternating ones; this difference persisted for ∼10 s. In addition, resetting arising from a single deviant (longer tone) was associated only with constant-frequency inducers. Overall, the results suggest that constant-frequency inducers promote segregation by capturing one subset of test-sequence tones into an ongoing, preestablished stream, and that a deviant tone may reduce segregation by disrupting this capture. These findings offer new insight into the dynamics of stream segregation, and have implications for the neural basis of streaming and the role of attention in stream formation.
一系列恒定频率的音调可以促进后续交替频率音调序列中的流分离,但为什么会产生这种效果还不完全清楚,其时间进程也尚未得到研究。实验 1 使用 2.0 秒长的恒定频率诱导器(低频纯音重复 10 次)来促进后续 1.2 秒交替低频和高频音调测试序列中的分离。用沉默代替最后一个诱导器音调会大大降低报告的测试序列分离度。当第 4 个或第 7 个诱导器被沉默取代时,这种降低不会发生。这表明在诱导/测试序列边界的变化会主动重置累积,而不是由于呈现的诱导器音调较少而导致较少的分离。此外,实验 2 发现,恒定频率的诱导器仅在三个音调后就能产生最大的分离促进效果——这与通常观察到的交替频率序列的更渐进的累积形成鲜明对比。实验 3 要求听众连续判断 20 秒测试序列的分组。恒定频率的诱导器比交替频率的诱导器更有效地促进分离;这种差异持续了约 10 秒。此外,仅由单个异常(更长的音调)引起的重置仅与恒定频率的诱导器有关。总的来说,这些结果表明,恒定频率的诱导器通过将测试序列中的一部分音调捕获到正在进行的预先建立的流中,从而促进分离,而异常音调可能通过破坏这种捕获来降低分离。这些发现为流分离的动态提供了新的见解,并对流分离和注意在流形成中的作用的神经基础具有启示意义。