Haywood Nicholas R, McAlpine David, Vickers Deborah, Roberts Brian
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, The University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241293787. doi: 10.1177/23312165241293787.
Interaural time differences are often considered a weak cue for stream segregation. We investigated this claim with headphone-presented pure tones differing in a related form of interaural configuration-interaural phase differences (ΔIPD)-or/and in frequency (ΔF). In experiment 1, sequences comprised 5 × ABA- repetitions (A and B = 80-ms tones, "-" = 160-ms silence), and listeners reported whether integration or segregation was heard. Envelope shape was varied but remained constant across all tones within a trial. Envelopes were either quasi-trapezoidal or had a fast attack and slow release (FA-SR) or vice versa (SA-FR). The FA-SR envelope caused more segregation than SA-FR in a task where only ΔIPD cues were present, but not in a corresponding ΔF-only task. In experiment 2, interstimulus interval (ISI) was varied (0-60 ms) between FA-SR tones. ΔF-based segregation decreased with increasing ISI, whereas ΔIPD-based segregation increased. This suggests that binaural temporal integration may limit segregation at short ISIs. In another task, ΔF and ΔIPD cues were presented alone or in combination. Here, ΔIPD-based segregation was greatly reduced, suggesting ΔIPD-based segregation is highly sensitive to experimental context. Experiments 1-2 demonstrate that ΔIPD can promote segregation in optimized stimuli/tasks. Experiment 3 employed a task requiring integration for good performance. Listeners detected a delay on the final four B tones of an 8 × ABA- sequence. Although performance worsened with increasing ΔF, increasing ΔIPD had only a marginal impact. This suggests that, even in stimuli optimized for ΔIPD-based segregation, listeners remained mostly able to disregard ΔIPD when segregation was detrimental to performance.
双耳时间差通常被认为是用于流分离的一个微弱线索。我们使用耳机呈现的纯音对这一说法进行了研究,这些纯音在一种相关形式的双耳配置——双耳相位差(ΔIPD)或/和频率(ΔF)上有所不同。在实验1中,序列由5×ABA重复组成(A和B为80毫秒的音调,“-”为160毫秒的静音),听众报告听到的是整合还是分离。包络形状有所变化,但在一次试验中的所有音调中保持不变。包络要么是准梯形的,要么具有快速起始和缓慢释放(FA-SR),或者反之(SA-FR)。在仅存在ΔIPD线索的任务中,FA-SR包络比SA-FR包络导致更多的分离,但在相应的仅存在ΔF的任务中并非如此。在实验2中,FA-SR音调之间的刺激间隔(ISI)有所变化(0 - 60毫秒)。基于ΔF的分离随着ISI的增加而减少,而基于ΔIPD的分离则增加。这表明双耳时间整合可能在短ISI时限制分离。在另一项任务中,单独或组合呈现ΔF和ΔIPD线索。在此,基于ΔIPD的分离大大减少,表明基于ΔIPD的分离对实验环境高度敏感。实验1 - 2表明,ΔIPD可以在优化的刺激/任务中促进分离。实验3采用了一项要求整合才能有良好表现的任务。听众检测8×ABA序列最后四个B音调上的延迟。尽管随着ΔF的增加表现变差,但增加ΔIPD只有边际影响。这表明,即使在针对基于ΔIPD的分离进行优化的刺激中,当分离对表现不利时,听众大多仍能忽略ΔIPD。