Suppr超能文献

基于双耳相位差线索的声流分离影响因素。

Factors Influencing Stream Segregation Based on Interaural Phase Difference Cues.

作者信息

Haywood Nicholas R, McAlpine David, Vickers Deborah, Roberts Brian

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, The University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241293787. doi: 10.1177/23312165241293787.

Abstract

Interaural time differences are often considered a weak cue for stream segregation. We investigated this claim with headphone-presented pure tones differing in a related form of interaural configuration-interaural phase differences (ΔIPD)-or/and in frequency (ΔF). In experiment 1, sequences comprised 5 × ABA- repetitions (A and B = 80-ms tones, "-" = 160-ms silence), and listeners reported whether integration or segregation was heard. Envelope shape was varied but remained constant across all tones within a trial. Envelopes were either quasi-trapezoidal or had a fast attack and slow release (FA-SR) or vice versa (SA-FR). The FA-SR envelope caused more segregation than SA-FR in a task where only ΔIPD cues were present, but not in a corresponding ΔF-only task. In experiment 2, interstimulus interval (ISI) was varied (0-60 ms) between FA-SR tones. ΔF-based segregation decreased with increasing ISI, whereas ΔIPD-based segregation increased. This suggests that binaural temporal integration may limit segregation at short ISIs. In another task, ΔF and ΔIPD cues were presented alone or in combination. Here, ΔIPD-based segregation was greatly reduced, suggesting ΔIPD-based segregation is highly sensitive to experimental context. Experiments 1-2 demonstrate that ΔIPD can promote segregation in optimized stimuli/tasks. Experiment 3 employed a task requiring integration for good performance. Listeners detected a delay on the final four B tones of an 8 × ABA- sequence. Although performance worsened with increasing ΔF, increasing ΔIPD had only a marginal impact. This suggests that, even in stimuli optimized for ΔIPD-based segregation, listeners remained mostly able to disregard ΔIPD when segregation was detrimental to performance.

摘要

双耳时间差通常被认为是用于流分离的一个微弱线索。我们使用耳机呈现的纯音对这一说法进行了研究,这些纯音在一种相关形式的双耳配置——双耳相位差(ΔIPD)或/和频率(ΔF)上有所不同。在实验1中,序列由5×ABA重复组成(A和B为80毫秒的音调,“-”为160毫秒的静音),听众报告听到的是整合还是分离。包络形状有所变化,但在一次试验中的所有音调中保持不变。包络要么是准梯形的,要么具有快速起始和缓慢释放(FA-SR),或者反之(SA-FR)。在仅存在ΔIPD线索的任务中,FA-SR包络比SA-FR包络导致更多的分离,但在相应的仅存在ΔF的任务中并非如此。在实验2中,FA-SR音调之间的刺激间隔(ISI)有所变化(0 - 60毫秒)。基于ΔF的分离随着ISI的增加而减少,而基于ΔIPD的分离则增加。这表明双耳时间整合可能在短ISI时限制分离。在另一项任务中,单独或组合呈现ΔF和ΔIPD线索。在此,基于ΔIPD的分离大大减少,表明基于ΔIPD的分离对实验环境高度敏感。实验1 - 2表明,ΔIPD可以在优化的刺激/任务中促进分离。实验3采用了一项要求整合才能有良好表现的任务。听众检测8×ABA序列最后四个B音调上的延迟。尽管随着ΔF的增加表现变差,但增加ΔIPD只有边际影响。这表明,即使在针对基于ΔIPD的分离进行优化的刺激中,当分离对表现不利时,听众大多仍能忽略ΔIPD。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e971/11629429/6455eca1e73e/10.1177_23312165241293787-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验