Suppr超能文献

错误管理训练中个体差异的调节作用:谁能从错误中学习?

The moderating effect of individual differences in error-management training: who learns from mistakes?

机构信息

ARC Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research, Ageing, Work and Health Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, Cumberland Campus C42, University of Sydney, P.O. Box 170, Lidcombe NSW 1825, Australia.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2013 Apr;55(2):435-48. doi: 10.1177/0018720812451856.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the effectiveness of error-encouragement training and the influence of ability and personality attribute-treatment interactions using a dynamic decision-making task.

BACKGROUND

Error-encouragement training is said to be more effective than error-avoidance training because active exploration and error encouragement promote better learning and transfer. Past research, which is limited by confounded experimental designs involving simple tasks with little consideration of individual differences, provides evidence for the value of active exploration but less so for error encouragement

METHOD

We randomly allocated 164 participants to receive error-encouragement, error-avoidance, or no error-related instructions in training on ATC-lab, a dynamic computer simulated air traffic control task. Active exploration and task information were controlled, and ability and personality were assessed.

RESULTS

Error encouragement yielded better transfer performance than did error avoidance but was no better than the control training. Higher- rather than lower-ability trainees benefited from training with an error orientation (positive or negative), suggesting that learning from errors in training requires greater cognitive resources. Trainees higher in openness to experience and agreeableness performed more poorly with error-avoidance training than with error-encouragement and control training.

CONCLUSION

Error-avoidance training had a detrimental effect especially for those less open to experience, lower in agreeableness, and of lower ability. The significant benefits of error-encouragement training reported in previous research were probably attributable to confounding factors, such as active exploration and differential task information.

APPLICATION

Although errors and active exploration can be useful learning tools in training, trainers should be mindful that focusing on errors, whether positively or negatively, may not suit everyone.

摘要

目的

我们使用动态决策任务研究了错误鼓励训练的有效性以及能力和人格属性-治疗相互作用的影响。

背景

错误鼓励训练据说比错误避免训练更有效,因为主动探索和错误鼓励可以促进更好的学习和转移。过去的研究受到涉及简单任务的混杂实验设计的限制,并且很少考虑个体差异,这些研究为主动探索的价值提供了证据,但为错误鼓励的价值提供的证据较少。

方法

我们将 164 名参与者随机分配到 ATC-lab 上接受错误鼓励、错误避免或无错误相关指导的训练,这是一项动态计算机模拟空中交通管制任务。主动探索和任务信息是受控制的,并且评估了能力和人格。

结果

错误鼓励比错误避免产生了更好的转移表现,但并不比控制训练更好。与具有错误导向(积极或消极)的训练相比,能力较高的受训者受益更多,这表明在训练中从错误中学习需要更多的认知资源。在开放性和宜人性方面得分较高的受训者在避免错误的训练中表现不如在错误鼓励和控制训练中表现出色。

结论

错误避免训练具有不利影响,特别是对于那些开放性较低、宜人性较低且能力较低的人。以前的研究报告的错误鼓励训练的显著益处可能归因于混杂因素,例如主动探索和不同的任务信息。

应用

尽管错误和主动探索可以成为培训中的有用学习工具,但培训师应该注意到,无论是积极还是消极地关注错误,可能并不适合每个人。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验