Porteri Corinna, Togni Elena, Pasqualetti Patrizio
Bioethics Unit, IRCCS San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
SeSMIT- Medical Statistics and Information Technology, AFaR - Associazione Fatebenefratelli per la Ricerca, Rome, Italy.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Feb;22(2):260-5. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.107. Epub 2013 May 22.
Gaps in regulations pertaining to the collection and storage of biological materials in a biobank, at least in the European context, have made the writing of local guidelines essential from an ethical point of view. Nevertheless, until recently, the elaboration of local guidelines for the collection, use and storage of biological materials in a biobank has been the exception in Italy and all European countries. In this context, it is of value to know the policies, even if they are unwritten, of local ethics committees (ECs) engaged in the evaluation of research protocols involving biobanks and biological materials. This paper presents the results of a survey carried out among local Italian ECs (229) to document their attitudes and policies regarding the management of the ethical issues related to biobanks and the use of biological materials. A questionnaire was developed to investigate the areas regarded as critical from an ethical-legal point of view: informed consent and information to the subjects; protection of confidentiality; communication of research results; access/transfer of biological materials and related data; ownership of samples and data and intellectual property rights; and subjects' remuneration and benefit sharing. Twenty-six ECs from the Italian Institutes for Research and Care (62%) and 26 other ECs (14%) participated in the survey.
至少在欧洲范围内,生物样本库中生物材料收集和存储相关法规存在空白,这使得从伦理角度撰写地方指南变得至关重要。然而,直到最近,在意大利和所有欧洲国家,为生物样本库中生物材料的收集、使用和存储制定地方指南仍是例外情况。在此背景下,了解参与评估涉及生物样本库和生物材料研究方案的地方伦理委员会(EC)的政策(即使是不成文的政策)具有重要意义。本文介绍了对意大利地方伦理委员会(229个)进行调查的结果,以记录它们在生物样本库伦理问题管理及生物材料使用方面的态度和政策。设计了一份问卷,以调查从伦理 - 法律角度被视为关键的领域:受试者的知情同意和信息告知;保密保护;研究结果的传达;生物材料及相关数据的获取/转移;样本和数据的所有权以及知识产权;受试者的报酬和利益分享。来自意大利研究与护理机构的26个伦理委员会(62%)和其他26个伦理委员会(14%)参与了此次调查。