• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A review of ethical considerations for ventricular assist device placement in older adults.老年患者心室辅助装置置入的伦理学考虑因素综述。
Aging Dis. 2013 Jan 18;4(2):100-12. Print 2013 Apr.
2
Ethical dilemmas surrounding the use of ventricular assist devices in supporting patients with end-stage organ dysfunction.围绕使用心室辅助装置支持终末期器官功能障碍患者所产生的伦理困境。
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2013 Jan-Mar;9(1):11-4. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-9-1-11.
3
Compassionate deactivation of ventricular assist devices in pediatric patients.儿科患者心室辅助装置的同情性停用
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016 May;35(5):564-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.03.020. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
4
Left ventricular assist devices and other devices for end-stage heart failure: utility of echocardiography.左心室辅助装置和其他终末期心力衰竭设备:超声心动图的应用。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2010 May;12(3):257-64. doi: 10.1007/s11886-010-0102-0.
5
Ethical challenges with the left ventricular assist device as a destination therapy.作为终末期治疗手段的左心室辅助装置所面临的伦理挑战。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2008 Aug 11;3:20. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-3-20.
6
Ethical Considerations in the Long-Term Ventricular Assist Device Patient.长期使用心室辅助装置患者的伦理考量
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2017 Feb;14(1):7-12. doi: 10.1007/s11897-017-0313-4.
7
Responding to Ventricular Assist Device Recalls: An Ethical Guide for Mechanical Circulatory Support Programs.回应心室辅助装置召回:机械循环支持项目的伦理指南。
ASAIO J. 2020 Apr;66(4):363-366. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001005.
8
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of second- and third-generation left ventricular assist devices as either bridge to transplant or alternative to transplant for adults eligible for heart transplantation: systematic review and cost-effectiveness model.第二代和第三代左心室辅助装置作为适合心脏移植的成人移植桥接或替代治疗的临床效果和成本效益:系统评价和成本效益模型。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Nov;17(53):1-499, v-vi. doi: 10.3310/hta17530.
9
Ethical challenges of deactivation of cardiac devices in advanced heart failure.晚期心力衰竭中心脏设备停用的伦理挑战
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2014 Jun;11(2):119-25. doi: 10.1007/s11897-014-0194-8.
10
Compassionate deactivation of ventricular assist devices in children: A survey of pediatric ventricular assist device clinicians' perspectives and practices.儿童心室辅助装置的同情性停用:儿科心室辅助装置临床医生观点与实践的调查
Pediatr Transplant. 2019 May;23(3):e13359. doi: 10.1111/petr.13359. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Interdisciplinary Research in Alzheimer's Disease and the Roles International Societies Can Play.阿尔茨海默病的跨学科研究以及国际协会可发挥的作用。
Aging Dis. 2021 Feb 1;12(1):36-41. doi: 10.14336/AD.2020.0602. eCollection 2021 Feb.
2
Palliative Medicine and Preparedness Planning for Patients Receiving Left Ventricular Assist Device as Destination Therapy-Challenges to Measuring Impact and Change in Institutional Culture.接受左心室辅助装置作为终末期治疗患者的姑息治疗与预案规划——衡量机构文化影响与变化的挑战
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Aug;54(2):231-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.10.372. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
3
Mechanical circulatory support in the new era: an overview.新时代的机械循环支持:概述
Crit Care. 2016 Mar 16;20:66. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1235-3.
4
Ventricular assist devices as destination therapy: psychosocial and ethical implications.作为终末期治疗的心室辅助装置:心理社会及伦理意义
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2015 Jan-Mar;11(1):9-11. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-11-1-9.
5
Ethical challenges of deactivation of cardiac devices in advanced heart failure.晚期心力衰竭中心脏设备停用的伦理挑战
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2014 Jun;11(2):119-25. doi: 10.1007/s11897-014-0194-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Recommendations for the use of mechanical circulatory support: device strategies and patient selection: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.机械循环支持的使用建议:设备策略与患者选择:美国心脏协会的科学声明
Circulation. 2012 Nov 27;126(22):2648-67. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182769a54. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
2
Ramping up evidence-based ventricular assist device care.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 30;60(18):1776-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.978. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
3
Beyond survival: recommendations from INTERMACS for assessing function and quality of life with mechanical circulatory support.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012 Nov;31(11):1158-64. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2012.08.020. Epub 2012 Sep 23.
4
Quality of life and left ventricular assist device support.生活质量与左心室辅助装置支持
Circulation. 2012 Aug 14;126(7):866-74. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.040279.
5
Ethics of the heart: ethical and policy challenges in the treatment of advanced heart failure.心脏伦理学:晚期心力衰竭治疗中的伦理与政策挑战
Perspect Biol Med. 2012 Winter;55(1):71-80. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2012.0009.
6
Advance directives in community patients with heart failure.社区心力衰竭患者的预立医疗指示
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 May;5(3):283-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.966036.
7
Patient selection for mechanical circulatory support.机械循环辅助患者选择。
Heart Fail Rev. 2013 Jan;18(1):27-34. doi: 10.1007/s10741-012-9316-0.
8
Risk assessment for continuous flow left ventricular assist devices: does the destination therapy risk score work? An analysis of over 1,000 patients.连续流动左心室辅助装置的风险评估:目标治疗风险评分是否有效?对超过 1000 名患者的分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jul 3;60(1):44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.032. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
9
Timing isn't everything: donor heart allocation in the present LVAD era.时机并非一切:当前左心室辅助装置时代的供体心脏分配
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jul 3;60(1):52-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.017. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
10
Taking a back seat: support and self-preservation in close relatives of patients with left ventricular assist device.退居幕后:左心室辅助装置患者的近亲的支持和自我保护。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2012 Dec;11(4):380-7. doi: 10.1177/1474515111435609. Epub 2012 Apr 18.

老年患者心室辅助装置置入的伦理学考虑因素综述。

A review of ethical considerations for ventricular assist device placement in older adults.

机构信息

Center for Medical Ethics & Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine & The Methodist Hospital System, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

Aging Dis. 2013 Jan 18;4(2):100-12. Print 2013 Apr.

PMID:23696952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3659250/
Abstract

This article reviews some of the complex ethical issues that accompany the diffusion of ventricular assist devices (VADs) for heart failure patients, with a particular emphasis on issues unique to older adults. In doing so, the ethical issues are centered on three decision points: (a) patient selection; (b) informed consent (i.e., initiation of the device); and (c) end of life (i.e., deactivation of the device.) It is contended that, with the technological improvements in heart failure treatments and new indications, the decision making process for VAD placement and deactivation has become more clinically and ethically challenging, particularly for older adults. Areas for potential future research are identified.

摘要

本文回顾了心力衰竭患者使用心室辅助装置(VAD)所带来的一些复杂伦理问题,特别强调了老年人特有的问题。在这样做的过程中,伦理问题集中在三个决策点上:(a)患者选择;(b)知情同意(即,开始使用设备);和(c)生命末期(即,停用设备)。有人认为,随着心力衰竭治疗技术的改进和新的适应症的出现,VAD 放置和停用的决策过程在临床上和伦理上都变得更加具有挑战性,特别是对老年人而言。确定了未来潜在的研究领域。