Center for Evidence-based Practice, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Penn Medicine Center for Evidence-based Practice, 3535 Market St, Ste 50, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Sep;57(5):725-34. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit333. Epub 2013 May 22.
The number of systematic reviews published in the peer-reviewed literature has increased dramatically in the last decade, and for good reason. They have become an essential resource for clinicians who want unbiased and current answers for their clinical questions; researchers and funders who want to identify the most critical evidence gaps for study; payers and administrators who want to make coverage, formulary, and purchasing decisions; and policymakers who want to develop quality measures and clinical guidelines. Targeted to beginners interested in conducting their own systematic reviews and users of systematic reviews looking for a brief introduction, this primer (1) highlights the differences between review types; (2) outlines the major steps in performing a systematic review; and (3) offers a set of resources to help authors perform and report valid and actionable systematic reviews.
在过去的十年中，同行评议文献中发表的系统评价数量大幅增加，这是有充分理由的。它们已成为临床医生的重要资源，这些临床医生希望为他们的临床问题提供公正和最新的答案；研究人员和资助者希望确定最关键的证据空白以进行研究；支付者和管理者希望做出覆盖范围、配方和采购决策；以及政策制定者希望制定质量措施和临床指南。本指南（1）针对有兴趣进行自己的系统评价的初学者和正在寻找简短介绍的系统评价用户，重点介绍了不同类型的综述之间的差异；（2）概述了进行系统评价的主要步骤；（3）提供了一系列资源，以帮助作者进行和报告有效和可行的系统评价。
