Suppr超能文献

并非如此简单:急性护理中的烟草使用识别和记录。

It's not that simple: tobacco use identification and documentation in acute care.

机构信息

Division of Human Sciences, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, MS2008, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 May 21;10(5):2069-83. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10052069.

Abstract

This environmental telephone interview scan was designed to identify: (1) how hospitals in one Canadian province incorporated tobacco use identification/documentation systems into practice; and, (2) challenges/issues with tobacco identification/documentation. Participants included 36/139 hospitals previously identified to offer cessation services. Results showed hospitals aided by researchers monitored and tracked tobacco use; those not aligned with researchers did not. The wording of tobacco items most commonly included use within the last 6-months (42%), 30-days (39%), or 7-days (33%), or use without reference to time (e.g., "Do you smoke?"; 39%); wording sometimes depended on admitting form space limitations. The admission process determined where the tobacco item appeared, which differed by hospital-75% included it on an admitting form (75%) and/or nursing assessment (56%); the item sometimes varied by unit. There were also different processes by which the item triggered delivery of cessation interventions; most frequently (69%), staff nurses were triggered to provide an intervention. The findings suggest that adding a tobacco use question to a hospital's admitting process is potentially not that simple. Deciding on the purpose of the question, when it will be asked and by whom, space allotted on the form, and how it will trigger an intervention are important considerations that can affect the question wording, form/location, systems required, data extraction, and resources.

摘要

这项环境电话访谈调查旨在确定

(1) 加拿大一个省份的医院如何将烟草使用识别/记录系统纳入实践;以及(2) 与烟草识别/记录相关的挑战/问题。参与者包括之前确定提供戒烟服务的 139 家医院中的 36 家。结果表明,在研究人员的帮助下,医院监测和跟踪烟草使用情况;而那些与研究人员不一致的医院则没有。烟草项目最常用的措辞包括在过去 6 个月内使用(42%)、30 天内使用(39%)或 7 天内使用(33%),或者不提及时间使用(例如,“你吸烟吗?”;39%);措辞有时取决于入院表格的空间限制。入院流程决定了烟草项目出现的位置,不同医院之间存在差异-75%的医院将其列入入院表格(75%)和/或护理评估(56%);该项目有时因单位而异。触发戒烟干预措施的过程也不同;最常见的是(69%),值班护士被触发提供干预。研究结果表明,在医院的入院流程中添加一个烟草使用问题可能并不那么简单。确定问题的目的、何时以及由谁提出问题、表格上的空间分配以及如何触发干预措施都是重要的考虑因素,这些因素可能会影响问题的措辞、表格/位置、所需系统、数据提取和资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38db/3709365/3b429a6e7e44/ijerph-10-02069-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验