Suppr超能文献

发布的急诊科等待时间并不总是准确的。

Posted emergency department wait times are not always accurate.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Akron General Medical Center, Akron, OH, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;20(4):421-3. doi: 10.1111/acem.12107.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Hospitals around the United States are advertising emergency department (ED) wait times. The objective was to measure the difference between publicly posted and actual ED wait times and to compare these between ED site volumes.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective consecutive sample of ED patients at one hospital system with four EDs. The wait times of 8,889 patients were included in this analysis. One ED was in a large teaching hospital with 5,000 ED patients per month; the other three were freestanding or community EDs without teaching and with fewer than 2,000 ED patients per month each. The publicly posted ED wait times at the time of patient arrival were recorded and compared to the actual wait times as retrieved from the ED tracking system. The difference between posted and actual wait times for each site was calculated. Separate one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests with post hoc testing were conducted to assess actual wait time and wait time difference between ED sites.

RESULTS

Mean and standard deviation (SD) wait time difference at the main ED with a volume of 5,000 patients per month was 31.5 (±61.2) minutes. At the facilities with fewer than 2,000 ED patients per month each, the differences in wait times were 4.2 (±21.8), 8.6 (±23.8), and 1.3 (±11.9) minutes. ANOVA results revealed that the main ED had significantly different actual wait time and wait time differences (p < 0.05) when compared to the other three EDs.

CONCLUSIONS

In one hospital system, publicly posted ED wait times show better accuracy in EDs that see 2,000 or fewer patients per month and less accuracy for an ED that sees 5,000 patients per month, likely due to flow confounders.

摘要

目的

美国各地的医院都在宣传急诊科(ED)的等待时间。目的是测量公开公布的 ED 等待时间与实际 ED 等待时间之间的差异,并比较 ED 站点之间的差异。

方法

这项研究是对一家医院系统的四个 ED 进行回顾性连续样本的研究。本分析共纳入了 8889 名 ED 患者。一个 ED 位于一家拥有 5000 名 ED 患者的大型教学医院;其他三个是独立或社区 ED,没有教学,每个 ED 的患者人数少于 2000 人。记录患者到达时公开公布的 ED 等待时间,并与从 ED 跟踪系统中检索到的实际等待时间进行比较。计算每个站点的公布和实际等待时间之间的差异。对不同 ED 站点的实际等待时间和等待时间差异进行了单独的单因素方差分析(ANOVA)检验,并进行了事后检验。

结果

每月有 5000 名患者的主要 ED 的平均和标准差(SD)等待时间差为 31.5(±61.2)分钟。在每月 ED 患者少于 2000 人的设施中,等待时间的差异分别为 4.2(±21.8)、8.6(±23.8)和 1.3(±11.9)分钟。ANOVA 结果表明,与其他三个 ED 相比,主要 ED 的实际等待时间和等待时间差异存在显著差异(p<0.05)。

结论

在一个医院系统中,每月有 2000 名或更少患者就诊的 ED 公布的 ED 等待时间更准确,而每月有 5000 名患者就诊的 ED 公布的 ED 等待时间准确性较低,这可能是由于流量混杂因素所致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验