Trainees in peer review: our experience.
作者信息
Castillo M
出版信息
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Feb;35(2):211-3. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3548. Epub 2013 May 23.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Trainees in peer review: our experience.同行评审培训学员：我们的经验
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Feb;35(2):211-3. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3548. Epub 2013 May 23.
2
Submitting a manuscript to the ASRT.向美国放射技师协会提交稿件。
Radiol Technol. 2012 Jan-Feb;83(3):291-2.
3
Getting to yes: the fate of neuroradiology manuscripts rejected by radiology over a 2-year period.《达成共识：两年内被放射学杂志拒稿的神经放射学稿件的命运》
Radiology. 2011 Jul;260(1):3-5. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2602201103.
4
Section Editor's Notebook: Mentoring, Academic Careers, and Manuscript Reviewing.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jan;208(1):1. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17519. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
5
Reference accuracy: authors', reviewers', editors', and publishers' contributions.参考文献准确性：作者、审稿人、编辑和出版商的贡献。
J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Dec;29(12):1587-9. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.12.1587. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
6
How can I reduce the chances of my paper being rejected?我怎样才能降低我的论文被拒的几率？
ANZ J Surg. 2016 May;86(5):325. doi: 10.1111/ans.13547.
7
Reducing the costs of peer review.降低同行评审成本。
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Apr;11(4):375. doi: 10.1038/nn0408-375.
8
Editorial transition.编辑交接。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Feb;35(2):213. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3882. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
9
Behind the curtain: a look inside the publication process.幕后：窥探出版过程
Radiol Technol. 2014 Sep-Oct;86(1):90-2.
10
Re: Reviewers of manuscripts submitted to The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry.
Can J Psychiatry. 1995 Sep;40(7):427-8. doi: 10.1177/070674379504000719.
引用本文的文献
1
The importance of peer review skills: Value and necessity of training residents to ensure continued scientific excellence.同行评审技能的重要性：培训住院医师以确保持续的科学卓越性的价值和必要性。
AEM Educ Train. 2024 May 19;8(Suppl 1):S76-S79. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10940. eCollection 2024 May.
本文引用的文献
1
Radiology 2007: reviewing for Radiology.
Radiology. 2007 Jul;244(1):7-11. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2441070689.
2
A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript.稿件评审系统指南。
J Nucl Med Technol. 2006 Jun;34(2):92-9.
3
Peer review--the newcomers' perspective.同行评审——新人视角
PLoS Biol. 2005 Sep;3(9):e326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030326. Epub 2005 Sep 13.
4
Effect of written feedback by editors on quality of reviews: two randomized trials.编辑书面反馈对评审质量的影响：两项随机试验
JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2781-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2781.
5
Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience. Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone?临床神经科学同行评审的可重复性。评审者之间的一致性是否比仅靠随机预期的更高？
Brain. 2000 Sep;123 ( Pt 9):1964-9. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.9.1964.
Zotero 插件