Department of Biology, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Integr Comp Biol. 2013 Aug;53(2):295-306. doi: 10.1093/icb/ict052. Epub 2013 May 23.
Moving on land versus in water imposes dramatically different requirements on the musculoskeletal system. Although many limbed vertebrates, such as salamanders and prehistoric tetrapodomorphs, have an axial system specialized for aquatic locomotion and an appendicular system adapted for terrestrial locomotion, diverse extant teleosts use the axial musculoskeletal system (body plus caudal fin) to move in these two physically disparate environments. In fact, teleost fishes living at the water's edge demonstrate diversity in natural history that is reflected in a variety of terrestrial behaviors: (1) species that have only incidental contact with land (such as largemouth bass, Micropterus) will repeatedly thrash, which can roll an individual downhill, but cannot produce effective overland movements, (2) species that have occasional contact with land (like Gambusia, the mosquitofish, which evade predators by stranding themselves) will produce directed terrestrial movement via a tail-flip jump, and (3) species that spend more than half of their lives on land (like the mudskipper, Periopthalmus) will produce a prone-jump, a behavior that allows the fish to anticipate where it will land at the end of the flight phase. Both tail-flip and prone jumps are characterized by a two-phase movement consisting of body flexion followed by extension-a movement pattern that is markedly similar to the aquatic fast-start. Convergence in kinematic pattern between effective terrestrial behaviors and aquatic fast starts suggests that jumps are an exaptation of a neuromuscular system that powers unsteady escape behaviors in the water. Despite such evidence that terrestrial behaviors evolved from an ancestral behavior that is ubiquitous among teleosts, some teleosts are unable to move effectively on land-possibly due to morphological trade-offs, wherein specialization for one environment comes at a cost to performance in the other. Indeed, upon emergence onto land, gravity places an increased mechanical load on the body, which may limit the maximum size of fish that can produce terrestrial locomotion via jumping. In addition, effective terrestrial locomotor performance may require a restructuring of the musculoskeletal system that directly conflicts with the low-drag, fusiform body shape that enhances steady swimming performance. Such biomechanical trade-offs may constrain which teleost species are able to make the evolutionary transition to life on land. Here, we synthesize the current knowledge of intermittent terrestrial locomotion in teleosts and demonstrate that extant fishes represent an important model system for elucidating fundamental evolutionary mechanisms and defining the physiological constraints that must be overcome to permit life in both the aquatic and terrestrial realms.
在陆地上移动与在水中移动对骨骼肌肉系统有显著不同的要求。虽然许多有腿的脊椎动物,如蝾螈和史前四足动物,具有专门用于水生运动的轴系统和适应陆地运动的附肢系统,但各种现存的硬骨鱼利用轴骨骼肌肉系统(身体加尾鳍)在这两种物理上截然不同的环境中移动。事实上,生活在水边的硬骨鱼表现出的自然历史多样性反映在各种陆地行为中:(1)只有偶然与陆地接触的物种(如大口黑鲈、小斑点鸡)会反复抽打,这可以使个体滚下山,但不能产生有效的陆地运动;(2)偶尔与陆地接触的物种(如食蚊鱼、大肚鱼,它们通过搁浅自己来逃避捕食者)会通过尾鳍翻转跳跃产生定向的陆地运动;(3)超过一半时间生活在陆地上的物种(如弹涂鱼)会产生俯跳,这种行为使鱼能够预测到它在飞行阶段结束时的着陆位置。尾鳍翻转和俯跳都有一个由身体弯曲 followed by extension 组成的两阶段运动——这种运动模式与水生快速启动非常相似。有效的陆地行为和水生快速启动之间运动模式的趋同表明,跳跃是一种神经肌肉系统的适应,该系统为水中不稳定的逃避行为提供动力。尽管有证据表明,陆地行为是从一种在硬骨鱼中普遍存在的祖先行为进化而来的,但有些硬骨鱼无法有效地在陆地上移动——这可能是由于形态学上的权衡,即对一种环境的专门化会导致在另一种环境中的表现下降。事实上,当硬骨鱼出现在陆地上时,重力会对身体施加更大的机械负荷,这可能会限制能够通过跳跃产生陆地运动的鱼的最大体型。此外,有效的陆地运动性能可能需要骨骼肌肉系统的重新构建,这与降低阻力、梭形身体形状直接冲突,而这种形状可以增强稳定的游泳性能。这种生物力学权衡可能会限制哪些硬骨鱼能够完成向陆地生活的进化转变。在这里,我们综合了硬骨鱼间歇性陆地运动的现有知识,并证明现存的鱼类是阐明基本进化机制和定义必须克服的生理限制以允许在水生和陆地领域生活的重要模型系统。