Suppr超能文献

学童听力筛查:降噪耳机的效用

Hearing screening for school children: utility of noise-cancelling headphones.

作者信息

Lo Ada Hiu Chong, McPherson Bradley

机构信息

Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.

出版信息

BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2013 May 24;13(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1472-6815-13-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Excessive ambient noise in school settings is a major concern for school hearing screening as it typically masks pure tone test stimuli (particularly 500 Hz and below). This results in false positive findings and subsequent unnecessary follow-up. With advances in technology, noise-cancelling headphones have been developed that reduce low frequency noise by superimposing an anti-phase signal onto the primary noise. This research study examined the utility of noise-cancelling headphone technology in a school hearing screening environment.

METHODS

The present study compared the audiometric screening results obtained from two air-conduction transducers-Sennheiser PXC450 noise-cancelling circumaural headphones (NC headphones) and conventional TDH-39 supra-aural earphones. Pure-tone hearing screening results (500 Hz to 4000 Hz, at 30 dB HL and 25 dB HL) were obtained from 232 school children, aged 6 to 8 years, in four Hong Kong primary schools.

RESULTS

Screening outcomes revealed significant differences in referral rates between TDH-39 earphones and NC headphones for both 30 dB HL and 25 dB HL criteria, regardless of the inclusion or exclusion of 500 Hz results. The kappa observed agreement (OA) showed that at both screening intensities, the transducers' referral agreement value for the 500 Hz inclusion group was smaller than for the 500 Hz exclusion group. Individual frequency analysis showed that the two transducers screened similarly at 1000 Hz and 2000 Hz at 25 dB HL, as well as at both 30 dB HL and 25 dB HL screening levels for 4000 Hz. Statistically significant differences were found for 500 Hz at 30 dB HL and at 25 dB HL, and for 1000 Hz and 2000 Hz at 30 dB HL. OA for individual frequencies showed weaker intra-frequency agreement between the two transducers at 500 Hz at both intensity criterion levels than at higher frequencies.

CONCLUSIONS

NC headphones screening results differed from those obtained from TDH-39 earphones, with lower referral rates at 500 Hz, particularly at the 25 dB HL criterion level. Therefore, NC headphones may be able to operate at lower screening intensities and subsequently increase pure-tone screening test sensitivity, without compromising specificity. NC headphones show some promise as possible replacements for conventional earphones in school hearing screening programs.

摘要

背景

学校环境中过高的环境噪音是学校听力筛查的一个主要问题,因为它通常会掩盖纯音测试刺激(特别是500赫兹及以下的频率)。这会导致假阳性结果以及随后不必要的后续检查。随着技术的进步,已开发出降噪耳机,通过将反相信号叠加到主要噪音上来降低低频噪音。本研究调查了降噪耳机技术在学校听力筛查环境中的效用。

方法

本研究比较了从两种气导换能器获得的听力筛查结果——森海塞尔PXC450降噪耳罩式耳机(NC耳机)和传统的TDH-39耳挂式耳机。从香港四所小学的232名6至8岁学童中获得了纯音听力筛查结果(500赫兹至4000赫兹,30分贝听力级和为25分贝听力级)。

结果

筛查结果显示,无论是否纳入500赫兹的结果,对于30分贝听力级和25分贝听力级标准,TDH-39耳机和NC耳机之间的转诊率存在显著差异。观察到的kappa一致性(OA)表明,在两种筛查强度下,500赫兹纳入组中换能器的转诊一致性值均小于500赫兹排除组。个体频率分析表明,两种换能器在25分贝听力级时对1000赫兹和2000赫兹的筛查结果相似,在4000赫兹的30分贝听力级和25分贝听力级筛查水平下也是如此。在30分贝听力级和25分贝听力级时,500赫兹以及在30分贝听力级时的1000赫兹和2000赫兹均发现有统计学显著差异。个体频率的OA显示,在两个强度标准水平下,两种换能器在500赫兹时的频率内一致性均弱于较高频率时。

结论

NC耳机的筛查结果与TDH-39耳机不同,在500赫兹时转诊率较低,尤其是在25分贝听力级标准水平。因此,NC耳机或许能够在较低的筛查强度下进行操作,从而提高纯音筛查测试的敏感性,而不会损害特异性。在学校听力筛查项目中,NC耳机有望成为传统耳机的可能替代品。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd12/3668193/a964db4b3993/1472-6815-13-6-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验