Botasso Maine, Sanches Seisse Gabriela Gandolfi, Bento Ricardo Ferreira, Samelli Alessandra Giannella
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Department of Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015 Apr;70(4):283-8. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2015(04)11.
To compare the efficacy and feasibility of teleaudiometry with that of sweep audiometry in elementary school children, using pure-tone audiometry as the gold standard.
A total of 243 students with a mean age of 8.3 years participated in the study. Of these, 118 were boys, and 125 were girls. The following procedures were performed: teleaudiometry screening with software that evaluates hearing at frequencies of 1,000, 2000 and 4000 Hz at 25 dBHL; sweep audiometry screening in an acoustic booth (20 dBHL at the same frequencies); pure-tone audiometry thresholds in an acoustic booth (frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz); and acoustic immittance measurements.
The diagnostic capacities of the teleaudiometry/sweep audiometry screening methods were as follows: sensitivity ϝ 58%/65%; specificity ϝ 86%/99%; positive predictive value ϝ 51%/91%; negative predictive value ϝ 89%/92%; and accuracy ϝ 81%/92%. Teleaudiometry and sweep audiometry showed moderate agreement. Furthermore, the use of these methods in series with immittance testing improved the specificity, whereas parallel testing improved the sensitivity.
Teleaudiometry was found to be reliable and feasible for screening hearing in school children. Moreover, teleaudiometry is the preferred method for remote areas where specialized personnel and specific equipment are not available, and its use may reduce the costs of hearing screening programs.
以纯音听力测试作为金标准,比较远程听力测试与扫频听力测试在小学生中的有效性和可行性。
共有243名平均年龄为8.3岁的学生参与了该研究。其中,118名是男孩,125名是女孩。进行了以下操作:使用在25 dBHL下评估1000、2000和4000 Hz频率听力的软件进行远程听力测试筛查;在隔音室中进行扫频听力测试筛查(相同频率下为20 dBHL);在隔音室中进行纯音听力测试阈值测量(500、1000、2000和4000 Hz频率);以及声导抗测量。
远程听力测试/扫频听力测试筛查方法的诊断能力如下:灵敏度分别为58%/65%;特异性分别为86%/99%;阳性预测值分别为51%/91%;阴性预测值分别为89%/92%;准确性分别为81%/92%。远程听力测试和扫频听力测试显示出中等一致性。此外,将这些方法与声导抗测试串联使用可提高特异性,而并联测试可提高灵敏度。
发现远程听力测试在筛查学童听力方面可靠且可行。此外,远程听力测试是在没有专业人员和特定设备的偏远地区的首选方法,其使用可能会降低听力筛查项目的成本。