Suppr超能文献

BOLD 响应对增加视觉对比度的敏感性:自旋回波与梯度回波 EPI。

Sensitivity of BOLD response to increasing visual contrast: spin echo versus gradient echo EPI.

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience and Imaging, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti, Italy.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 15;82:35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.069. Epub 2013 May 24.

Abstract

Previous evidence showed that spin-echo (SE) BOLD signals offer an increased linearity and promptness with respect to gradient-echo (GE) acquisition, possibly providing a more accurate estimate of the amplitude of neuronal activity. However there is no evidence that the two sequences differ in representing different activation levels due to changes in stimulus intensity. In this study at 3T we compared GE and SE BOLD responses to visual stimuli at increasing contrast levels (5%, 20%, 60%, and 100%). Both sequences showed a monotonic increase of the BOLD response with stimulus contrast. While the larger sensitivity of GE yielded overall larger signal changes, step-wise increase in activation for GE was significant only when comparing 20% with 5% contrast, whereas for SE a significant increase was observed also when comparing 60% with 20% contrast. Moreover, BOLD responses normalized to the lowest contrast showed that relative increases of SE fMRI signal with increasing stimulus strength are larger with respect to the corresponding values of GE signal. This difference was observed also when excluding voxels attributed to large vessels, suggesting a non negligible role of the extravascular contribution to the modulation of SE fMRI signal with stimulus intensity. These results are shown to be in agreement with theoretical predictions that we derived from a recently proposed model of GE and SE functional signals. The present findings suggest that, despite the limited increase in functional localization accuracy at low field, SE fMRI might offer a potential advantage in distinguishing different levels of stimulus-evoked brain activity.

摘要

先前的证据表明,自旋回波(SE)BOLD 信号相对于梯度回波(GE)采集具有更高的线性度和及时性,可能提供更准确的神经元活动幅度估计。然而,尚无证据表明这两种序列在表示由于刺激强度变化而引起的不同激活水平方面存在差异。在这项 3T 研究中,我们比较了视觉刺激在增加对比度水平(5%、20%、60%和 100%)时的 GE 和 SE BOLD 反应。两种序列均表现出 BOLD 响应随刺激对比度单调增加。虽然 GE 的较大灵敏度导致整体信号变化较大,但仅当将 20%与 5%对比度进行比较时,GE 的激活才会逐步增加,而对于 SE,则当将 60%与 20%对比度进行比较时,观察到明显的增加。此外,将 BOLD 响应归一化为最低对比度表明,随着刺激强度的增加,SE fMRI 信号的相对增加大于 GE 信号的对应值。当排除归因于大血管的体素时,也观察到了这种差异,这表明血管外成分对刺激强度调制 SE fMRI 信号具有不可忽略的作用。这些结果与我们从最近提出的 GE 和 SE 功能信号模型中得出的理论预测一致。本研究结果表明,尽管在低场下功能定位精度的提高有限,但 SE fMRI 可能具有在区分不同水平的刺激诱发脑活动方面的潜在优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验