Graduate Program in Structural and Computational Biology and Molecular Biophysics, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Structure. 2013 Jun 4;21(6):900-9. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2013.04.016. Epub 2013 May 23.
About a decade ago, three electron cryomicroscopy (cryo-EM) single-particle reconstructions of IP3R1 were reported at low resolution. It was disturbing that these structures bore little similarity to one another, even at the level of quaternary structure. Recently, we published an improved structure of IP3R1 at ∼1 nm resolution. However, this structure did not bear any resemblance to any of the three previously published structures, leading to the question of why the structure should be considered more reliable than the original three. Here, we apply several methods, including class-average/map comparisons, tilt-pair validation, and use of multiple refinement software packages, to give strong evidence for the reliability of our recent structure. The map resolution and feature resolvability are assessed with the gold standard criterion. This approach is generally applicable to assessing the validity of cryo-EM maps of other molecular machines.
大约十年前,有三个关于 IP3R1 的电子冷冻透射显微镜(cryo-EM)单颗粒重建的报道,分辨率较低。令人不安的是,这些结构彼此之间几乎没有相似之处,甚至在四级结构水平上也是如此。最近,我们发表了一个改进的 IP3R1 结构,分辨率约为 1nm。然而,这个结构与之前发表的三个结构都没有相似之处,这就引出了一个问题,为什么这个结构应该被认为比最初的三个结构更可靠。在这里,我们应用了几种方法,包括类平均/图谱比较、倾斜对验证以及使用多个重构软件包,为我们最近的结构的可靠性提供了强有力的证据。图谱分辨率和特征可分辨性是用黄金标准标准来评估的。这种方法通常适用于评估其他分子机器的 cryo-EM 图谱的有效性。