Bolewska J, Hansen H J, Holmstrup P, Pindborg J J, Stangerup M
Department of Oral Medicine and Oral Surgery, University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990 Jul;70(1):55-8. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(90)90178-u.
A total of 49 consecutive patients with lesions of the oral mucosa that were in contact with corroding dental amalgam restorations were subdivided into two groups. In group 1 the lesions were restricted to the contact area opposing the dental restoration, whereas the extent of the lesions in group 2 exceeded that of the contact area. Epicutaneous test for mercury allergy showed that a significantly greater proportion of the patients in group 1 had positive reactions to mercury than in group 2 (p = 0.019). The amalgam restorations were replaced by composite resin or porcelain fused to gold crowns, or contact between amalgam fillings and oral mucosa was prevented by an acrylic splint. After this treatment regression of lesions was far more pronounced in group 1 than in group 2 (p less than 0.001). On the basis of these findings, contact allergy to mercury is suggested as a possible etiologic factor of the mucosal changes in group 1, and the designation contact lesion is proposed for such lesions. The lesions of patients in group 2 seem unrelated to a contact allergy to mercury, and other causes such as lichen planus should be considered.
共有49例连续的口腔黏膜病变患者,其病变与腐蚀性牙科汞合金修复体接触,这些患者被分为两组。在第1组中,病变局限于与牙科修复体相对的接触区域,而第2组中病变的范围超过了接触区域。汞过敏的皮肤试验表明,第1组中对汞呈阳性反应的患者比例明显高于第2组(p = 0.019)。用复合树脂或烤瓷熔附金属冠替换汞合金修复体,或用丙烯酸夹板防止汞合金填充物与口腔黏膜接触。经过这种治疗后,第1组病变的消退比第2组更为明显(p < 0.001)。基于这些发现,提示汞接触过敏可能是第1组黏膜变化的病因,为此类病变提出了“接触性病变”这一名称。第2组患者的病变似乎与汞接触过敏无关,应考虑其他病因,如扁平苔藓。