University of Bari, Italy.
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Aug;34(8):2351-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.04.020. Epub 2013 May 25.
These two studies were aimed at evaluating standard technology resources for supporting activity and travel among patients with moderate Alzheimer's disease. Specifically, Study I assessed a pictorial instruction program relying on the use of a portable computer and a commercially available and inexpensive video editing software for supporting the performance of daily activities with three patients. Study II assessed the indoor travel performance of four patients (i.e., the three involved in Study I and a fourth patient with no previous research exposure) using a commercially available, basic doorbell system with sound and light cues. The percentages of correct activity steps obtained with the instruction program used in Study I were relatively high and largely similar to the percentages reported in previous studies using more sophisticated technology. During Study II, the percentages of correct travels of two patients matched the data of the most successful patients involved in previous studies with more sophisticated technology. The percentages of the other two patients tended to be lower than those obtained previously, but were still practically relevant. The implications of the results of the two studies and a number of issues for new research are discussed.
这两项研究旨在评估支持中度阿尔茨海默病患者活动和出行的标准技术资源。具体来说,研究 I 评估了一个依赖于使用便携式计算机和商业上可用且廉价的视频编辑软件来支持三名患者进行日常活动的图片说明程序。研究 II 使用一种商业上可用的、带有声音和灯光提示的基本门铃系统,评估了四名患者(即研究 I 中涉及的三名患者和第四名以前没有研究经验的患者)的室内出行表现。研究 I 中使用的指导程序获得的正确活动步骤百分比相对较高,与以前使用更复杂技术的研究报告的百分比大致相似。在研究 II 期间,两名患者的正确出行百分比与之前使用更复杂技术的最成功患者的数据相匹配。另外两名患者的百分比往往低于之前获得的百分比,但仍然具有实际意义。讨论了这两项研究的结果以及一些新研究的问题。