Duschek N, Waldhör T, Falkensammer J, Skrinjar E, Koulas S, Bayer G S, Assadian A
Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Montleartstrasse 37, Austria.
Int Angiol. 2013 Jun;32(3):319-26.
As recent data suggest a variable benefit of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or stenting (CAS), a careful selection of patients is mandatory for efficient stroke prevention. This retrospective study analyzed carotid intervention rates from 1999-2008 in Austria. The aim was to assess whether interventions for carotid stenosis were performed with respect to epidemiological trends and published data taking into account intervention type, age and gender.
Intervention numbers for internal carotid artery (ICA)-stenosis from a 10 years period (1999 to 2008) were retrieved from the national Austrian registry for hospital funding. Patients were grouped by gender, age (0-64, 65-74, older than 75 years) and intervention type.
CEA rates amounted to 32.2±1.4 per 100000 persons annually (female: 22.1±0.7, male: 43.0±2.3). Each year 9.1 CAS±1.6 per 100000 Austrians were performed (female: 9.3±1.8, male 8.9±1.7). CAS numbers increased (P<0.05), whereas CEA numbers stagnated, especially in older age groups. Women were more likely to undergo CAS than CEA compared to men.
Relative intervention rates for carotid stenosis have rather stagnated, although stroke incidence increases continuously in an overaging society. Despite controversial data, CAS rates have been rising constantly in elderly women. Secondary stroke prevention in Austria can be improved by a careful selection of future patients, especially with regard to female gender and type of intervention.
近期数据表明,颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)或支架置入术(CAS)的获益存在差异,因此必须谨慎选择患者以有效预防中风。这项回顾性研究分析了1999年至2008年奥地利的颈动脉干预率。目的是评估针对颈动脉狭窄的干预措施是否根据流行病学趋势和已发表数据进行,同时考虑干预类型、年龄和性别。
从奥地利国家医院资助登记处检索了10年期间(1999年至2008年)颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄的干预次数。患者按性别、年龄(0 - 64岁、65 - 74岁、75岁以上)和干预类型分组。
CEA率为每年每10万人32.2±1.4例(女性:22.1±0.7例,男性:43.0±2.3例)。每年每10万奥地利人中有9.1±1.6例进行CAS(女性:9.3±1.8例,男性8.9±1.7例)。CAS数量增加(P<0.05),而CEA数量停滞不前,尤其是在老年人群体中。与男性相比,女性接受CAS的可能性高于CEA。
尽管在老龄化社会中风发病率持续上升,但颈动脉狭窄的相对干预率相当停滞。尽管数据存在争议,但老年女性的CAS率一直在不断上升。通过谨慎选择未来患者,尤其是在女性性别和干预类型方面,奥地利的二级中风预防可以得到改善。