三种类型的柔韧性训练对主动和被动髋关节活动范围的影响。
Effect of three types of flexibility training on active and passive hip range of motion.
作者信息
López-Bedoya J, Vernetta-Santana M, Robles-Fuentes A, Ariza-Vargas L
机构信息
Department of Physical Education and Sport Faculty of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences Granada University, Granada, Spain.
出版信息
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2013 Jun;53(3):304-11.
AIM
The aim of this study was to measure the effect of 3 types of flexibility training, hold-relax (HR, N.=9), active isolated stretching (AIS, N.=9) and passive static stretching (PSS, N.=11) on passive and active range of motion of hip flexion after 9 weeks of flexibility training.
METHODS
The subjects were physical education college students (14 men and 15 women) whose ages ranged between 20 and 24 years (age mean 21.79, SD: 2.45). A multigroup pre- post-test design with three experimental groups was used. The range of movement was measured by digitalization of pre-test and post-test images.
RESULTS
Significant differences were found among the pre- and post-test for the three groups (P<0.05) on passive range of motion of the hip flexion, although there were no significant post-test differences between experimental groups. However, on the active range of motion of hip flexion there was only significant improvement among the pre-test and post-tests for PSS group (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION
The results suggest that PSS is the best option for the improvement of both active and passive range of motion.
目的
本研究旨在测量9周柔韧性训练后，三种柔韧性训练方式，即保持-放松法（HR，n = 9）、主动孤立伸展法（AIS，n = 9）和被动静态伸展法（PSS，n = 11）对髋关节屈曲被动和主动活动范围的影响。
方法
受试者为体育学院学生（14名男性和15名女性），年龄在20至24岁之间（平均年龄21.79，标准差：2.45）。采用多组前测-后测设计，分为三个实验组。通过对前测和后测图像进行数字化处理来测量运动范围。
结果
三组在髋关节屈曲被动活动范围的前测和后测之间存在显著差异（P<0.05），尽管实验组之间后测无显著差异。然而，在髋关节屈曲主动活动范围方面，仅PSS组在前测和后测之间有显著改善（P<0.05）。
结论
结果表明，PSS是改善主动和被动活动范围的最佳选择。
Zotero 插件