Vanderbilt Voice Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-8783, USA.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Sep;149(3):356-9. doi: 10.1177/0194599813491228. Epub 2013 May 28.
Clinical practice guidelines and performance measures are becoming increasingly pervasive. They epitomize the evidence-based movement, which recognizes that mere "clinical judgment" is often inadequate to synthesize all the important data to determine the best management for a particular patient. This movement has at its core the fundamental expectation that medical decisions be based on sound data rather than anecdote. Unfortunately, this concept rarely manifests in daily practices where significant variations in care still exist. Guidelines were designed to improve patient care, reduce unnecessary variation, and reduce attributed costs. Therefore, it is not surprising that associated recommendations are now being incorporated into health care legislation as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. In this environment, there is growing urgency for otolaryngologists to participate in rigorous comparative effectiveness research that will direct our Academy's guideline developers and policy makers to make recommendations that optimize care for all our patients.
临床实践指南和绩效指标正变得越来越普遍。它们是循证运动的缩影,该运动认识到,仅仅依靠“临床判断”往往不足以综合所有重要数据,以确定特定患者的最佳治疗方案。这一运动的核心是,期望医疗决策基于可靠的数据,而不是道听途说。不幸的是,这一概念在日常实践中很少得到体现,因为护理方面仍然存在着显著的差异。指南旨在改善患者护理,减少不必要的差异,并降低归因成本。因此,毫不奇怪,相关建议现在被纳入医疗保健立法,作为《患者保护与平价医疗法案》的一部分。在这种环境下,耳鼻喉科医生越来越迫切地需要参与严格的比较效果研究,以便指导我们学会的指南制定者和决策者提出建议,为我们所有的患者优化护理。