• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较单次头孢曲松给药在切开皮肤前和脐带夹闭后用于择期剖宫产术,以预防术后感染发病率。

Comparison of administration of single dose ceftriaxone for elective caesarean section before skin incision and after cord clamping in preventing post-operative infectious morbidity.

机构信息

Dept of Obstetrics and Gynecology, JIPMER, No 11, Type DII Quarters, JIPMER Campus, Dhanvantari Nagar, Puducherry, 605006, India.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Dec;288(6):1263-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2906-9. Epub 2013 May 29.

DOI:10.1007/s00404-013-2906-9
PMID:23715925
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of ceftriaxone before skin incision and after cord clamping in preventing post-operative infectious morbidity and neonatal outcome in elective caesarean section and to determine the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis before skin incision on neonatal outcome.

METHODS

Our study was a randomised controlled trial conducted among 874 women undergoing elective caesarean section from October 2010 to July 2012. These women were randomly categorised into two groups with 437 women in each group. Group 1 received single dose of ceftriaxone 1 g intravenously 15-45 min before skin incision. Group 2 received the antibiotic after cord clamping. Primary outcome measures were maternal post-operative infectious morbidities like surgical site wound infection, febrile morbidity, endometritis, urinary tract infections and neonatal sepsis. Results were analysed using Chi-square test and unpaired t test.

RESULTS

Surgical site wound infection occurred in 3 women in group 1 (0.7%) and 6 women in group 2 (1.4%). Fever occurred in 9 women in group 1 (2.1%) and 5 in group 2 (1.1%) with the p value of 0.419, not statistically significant. Urinary tract infection occurred in 9 women in group 1 (2.1%) and 7 women in group 2 (1.6%) with the p value of 0.801. None of the women in either group developed endometritis. About 20 neonates [10 neonates (2.3%) in group 1 and 10 neonates (2.3%) in group 2] required NICU admission after caesarean delivery. The reasons for admission were respiratory distress, prematurity and congenital anomaly. About 0.9% of neonates in group 1 and 1.8% in group 2 developed neonatal sepsis with positive blood culture (p = 0.388).

CONCLUSION

Timing of administration of prophylactic antibiotics for elective caesarean section either before skin incision or after cord clamping did not have significant difference in the occurrence of post-operative infectious morbidity. No adverse neonatal outcome was observed in women who received the antibiotic before skin incision.

摘要

目的

比较剖宫产术切皮前和断脐后使用头孢曲松预防术后感染发病率和新生儿结局的疗效,并确定切皮前使用抗生素预防对新生儿结局的影响。

方法

我们的研究是 2010 年 10 月至 2012 年 7 月间进行的一项随机对照试验,共纳入 874 例行择期剖宫产的妇女。这些妇女被随机分为两组,每组 437 人。组 1 产妇切皮前 15-45 分钟静脉注射头孢曲松 1 g 单次剂量。组 2 产妇在断脐后给予抗生素。主要观察指标为产妇术后感染发病率,如手术部位伤口感染、发热发病率、子宫内膜炎、尿路感染和新生儿败血症。结果采用卡方检验和独立样本 t 检验进行分析。

结果

组 1 有 3 名(0.7%)产妇发生手术部位伤口感染,组 2 有 6 名(1.4%)产妇发生手术部位伤口感染,两组比较差异无统计学意义(p = 0.419)。组 1 有 9 名(2.1%)产妇发热,组 2 有 5 名(1.1%)产妇发热,两组比较差异无统计学意义(p = 0.801)。两组均无产妇发生子宫内膜炎。两组各有 20 名(10 名/组)新生儿在剖宫产术后需要入住新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)。入住 NICU 的原因是呼吸窘迫、早产和先天性异常。组 1 有 10 名(2.3%)新生儿和组 2 有 10 名(2.3%)新生儿血培养阳性,发生新生儿败血症,两组比较差异无统计学意义(p = 0.388)。

结论

择期剖宫产术切皮前或断脐后预防性使用抗生素,在术后感染发病率方面无显著差异。切皮前使用抗生素的产妇未观察到新生儿不良结局。

相似文献

1
Comparison of administration of single dose ceftriaxone for elective caesarean section before skin incision and after cord clamping in preventing post-operative infectious morbidity.比较单次头孢曲松给药在切开皮肤前和脐带夹闭后用于择期剖宫产术,以预防术后感染发病率。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Dec;288(6):1263-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2906-9. Epub 2013 May 29.
2
Antibiotic prophylaxis before surgery vs after cord clamping in elective cesarean delivery: a double-blind, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.择期剖宫产手术前与脐带结扎后使用抗生素预防感染:一项双盲、前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照试验
Arch Surg. 2011 Dec;146(12):1404-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.725.
3
Timing of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Caesarean Delivery: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial and Meta-Analysis.择期剖宫产术中抗生素预防性应用的时机:一项多中心随机对照试验及荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 6;10(7):e0129434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129434. eCollection 2015.
4
Timing of intravenous prophylactic antibiotics for preventing postpartum infectious morbidity in women undergoing cesarean delivery.剖宫产术后预防产后感染性疾病的静脉预防性抗生素使用时机。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 5;2014(12):CD009516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009516.pub2.
5
The timing of antibiotics at cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.剖宫产时使用抗生素的时机:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Perinatol. 2012 Apr;29(4):273-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1295657. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
6
Routes of administration of antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing infection after caesarean section.剖宫产术后预防感染的抗生素预防性给药途径。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 17;2016(6):CD011876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011876.pub2.
7
Optimal timing of prophylactic antibiotic for cesarean delivery: a randomized comparative study.剖宫产预防性抗生素的最佳使用时机:一项随机对照研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013 Dec;39(12):1560-8. doi: 10.1111/jog.12102. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
8
Antibiotic prophylaxis for caesarean section at a Ugandan hospital: a randomised clinical trial evaluating the effect of administration time on the incidence of postoperative infections.乌干达一家医院剖宫产的抗生素预防:一项评估给药时间对术后感染发生率影响的随机临床试验
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Apr 12;15:91. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0514-3.
9
Ceftriaxone versus ampicillin/cloxacillin as antibiotic prophylaxis in elective caesarean section.剖宫产术中头孢曲松与氨苄西林/氯唑西林作为抗生素预防性用药的比较。
East Mediterr Health J. 2004 May;10(3):277-88.
10
Comparison of single versus multiple doses of antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing post-elective Caesarean section infectious morbidity.单次与多次剂量抗生素预防在降低择期剖宫产术后感染发病率方面的比较。
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2010 Apr-Jun;8(30):179-84. doi: 10.3126/kumj.v8i2.3554.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Lactobacillus Acidophilus (La5) on the Incidence of Urinary Tract Infection in the Puerperium: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.嗜酸乳杆菌(La5)对产褥期尿路感染发生率的影响:一项随机安慰剂对照试验
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.1007/s12602-025-10719-8.
2
Single Dose Versus 72-Hour Course of Ceftriazone for Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Preventing Post-Caesarean Wound Infection: A Randomized Control Trial.单剂量与72小时疗程头孢曲松用于剖宫产术后伤口感染预防的抗生素预防性治疗:一项随机对照试验
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2023 Apr-Jun;13(2):100-104. doi: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_279_22. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
3
Antibiotic Use During Pregnancy and Childbirth: Prospective Observational Study on Prevalence, Indications, and Prescribing Patterns in a German Tertiary Center.
孕期及分娩期抗生素的使用:德国一家三级医疗中心关于患病率、用药指征及处方模式的前瞻性观察研究
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2022 Dec 2;83(2):192-200. doi: 10.1055/a-1934-1761. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
Timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis for cesarean section is critical for gut microbiome development in term born infants.剖宫产术抗菌预防的时机对足月出生婴儿肠道微生物组的发育至关重要。
Gut Microbes. 2022 Jan-Dec;14(1):2038855. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2038855.
5
Neonatal sepsis definitions from randomised clinical trials.新生儿败血症的随机临床试验定义。
Pediatr Res. 2023 Apr;93(5):1141-1148. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01749-3. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
6
Timing of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Caesarean Delivery: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial and Meta-Analysis.择期剖宫产术中抗生素预防性应用的时机:一项多中心随机对照试验及荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 6;10(7):e0129434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129434. eCollection 2015.
7
Timing of intravenous prophylactic antibiotics for preventing postpartum infectious morbidity in women undergoing cesarean delivery.剖宫产术后预防产后感染性疾病的静脉预防性抗生素使用时机。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 5;2014(12):CD009516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009516.pub2.