Suppr超能文献

新加坡在晚期癌症诊断中不披露病情的做法:一个持续存在的挑战。

The practice of nondisclosure of advanced cancer diagnosis in Singapore: a continuing challenge.

机构信息

Singapore Health Services, Singapore 169611.

出版信息

Singapore Med J. 2013 May;54(5):255-8. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2013103.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The traditional family-centred approach to cancer management in Singapore often leads to nondisclosure of diagnosis to patients with advanced cancer. This study aimed to determine the rate of nondisclosure to such patients in Singapore, and compare it against the rate of nondisclosure to patients' families and that of a study conducted in 1992.

METHODS

Consecutive patients (n = 100) with advanced cancer who were referred to a palliative home care service in 2004 were studied retrospectively. Comparison between the 1992 and present study groups was performed using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to patient age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, gender and ethnicity to identify factors associated with nondisclosure.

RESULTS

The overall nondisclosure rate among patients with advanced cancer was 23% (23/100), compared to only 2% (2/99) among their families (p < 0.001). The nondisclosure rates among ECOG 0-2 and ECOG 3-4 patients were 11% (7/62) and 42% (16/38), respectively (p < 0.001). There was no significant improvement in the nondisclosure rate among ECOG 3-4 patients when compared to the 1992 study (p = 0.94). It was more likely for nondisclosure to occur among patients aged ≥ 70 years (p < 0.001; odds ratio [OR] 14.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.68-59.26) and those with poor ECOG performance status (p = 0.019; OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.26-12.73). There was no significant association between nondisclosure and gender or ethnicity (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Disclosure of diagnosis to patients with advanced cancer remains a challenge in Singapore. The relationship between nondisclosure and advanced age, as well as nondisclosure and poor ECOG performance status, needs to be clarified with further studies.

摘要

介绍

在新加坡,传统的以家庭为中心的癌症管理方法常常导致对晚期癌症患者隐瞒诊断结果。本研究旨在确定新加坡对这类患者隐瞒诊断的比例,并与 1992 年的研究结果进行比较。

方法

回顾性分析 2004 年转诊至姑息治疗居家护理服务的 100 例晚期癌症患者。使用卡方检验和 Fisher 精确检验比较 1992 年和本研究组的差异。应用多元逻辑回归分析患者年龄、东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态、性别和种族等因素与隐瞒诊断的关系。

结果

晚期癌症患者总体隐瞒诊断的比例为 23%(23/100),而其家属的隐瞒比例仅为 2%(2/99)(p<0.001)。ECOG 0-2 和 ECOG 3-4 患者的隐瞒比例分别为 11%(7/62)和 42%(16/38)(p<0.001)。ECOG 3-4 患者的隐瞒比例与 1992 年的研究相比并无显著改善(p=0.94)。年龄≥70 岁的患者更有可能隐瞒诊断(p<0.001;优势比[OR]14.77,95%置信区间[CI]3.68-59.26),ECOG 体能状态较差的患者更有可能隐瞒诊断(p=0.019;OR 4.0,95%CI 1.26-12.73)。隐瞒诊断与性别或种族无显著相关性(p>0.05)。

结论

在新加坡,向晚期癌症患者告知诊断结果仍然是一个挑战。需要进一步研究隐瞒诊断与年龄较大以及与 ECOG 体能状态较差之间的关系。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验