Acoustics Group, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;787:293-301. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1590-9_33.
Large binaural masking-level differences (BMLDs) can be observed when a tonal signal with an interaural phase difference of π is presented against a diotic masker. The BMLD is large when the signal is spectrally centered in the masker and decreases strongly for off-frequency signals. No such reduction in BMLD would be expected, if monaural detection were governed by energy cues and binaural detection by changes in interaural cross-correlation. The reduction in BMLD thus suggests either that binaural processing is impaired or, alternatively, that additional monaural cues are available in off-frequency conditions. In this study, a stimulus paradigm is used that is expected to impair the processing of additional monaural cues. In the base experiment, a 25-Hz-wide band of diotic noise centered at 700 Hz served as masker. A target tone was presented at 0, 30, 60, and 100 Hz above the masker center frequency, either interaurally in phase (S 0) or out of phase (S π). In the extended experiment, an additional interference tone was always presented spectrally below the masker at the same frequency distance as the target tone was positioned above the masker. The interferer level was 6 dB below the level of the 65 dB masker. By presenting the interferer, a strong modulation is introduced, which should impair the detectability of the target tone based on the beating of masker and target. Results show a small off-frequency BMLD in the base experiment in line with literature. Adding the interference tone produced an increase in both N 0 S 0 and the N 0 S π thresholds, suggesting that monaural modulation cues were indeed used, but also -suggesting that detection performance in the N 0 S π condition was dominated by monaural processing. Additional conditions with modulated interference tones at 500 Hz further supported our hypothesis that monaural modulation cues contributed to reduced -off-frequency BMLDs.
当呈现具有π 耳间相位差的音调信号与二耳掩蔽器时,可以观察到大的双耳掩蔽级差(BMLD)。当信号在掩蔽器中频谱中心时,BMLD 较大,并且对于离频信号强烈减小。如果单耳检测由能量线索控制,而双耳检测由耳间互相关的变化控制,则不应预期 BMLD 会降低。因此,BMLD 的降低表明双耳处理受到损害,或者在离频条件下提供了额外的单耳线索。在这项研究中,使用了一种预期会损害额外单耳线索处理的刺激范式。在基础实验中,以 700 Hz 为中心的 25 Hz 宽的二耳噪声带用作掩蔽器。目标音调以 0、30、60 和 100 Hz 的频率呈现,高于掩蔽器中心频率,要么在耳间相位(S 0),要么在耳间相位(S π)。在扩展实验中,总是在掩蔽器的频谱下方以与目标音调位于掩蔽器上方相同的频率距离呈现附加干扰音。干扰器的电平比 65 dB 掩蔽器低 6 dB。通过呈现干扰器,会引入强烈的调制,这应该会根据掩蔽器和目标的拍频降低目标音调的可检测性。结果显示,基础实验中的离频 BMLD 较小,与文献一致。添加干扰音会导致 N 0 S 0 和 N 0 S π 阈值增加,这表明确实使用了单耳调制线索,但也表明 N 0 S π 条件下的检测性能主要由单耳处理决定。具有调制干扰音的附加条件在 500 Hz 进一步支持了我们的假设,即单耳调制线索导致离频 BMLD 降低。