Department of Physical Geography, Trier University, Trier, Germany.
PLoS One. 2013 May 24;8(5):e64861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064861. Print 2013.
This study presents the comparison of experimental results with assumptions used in numerical models. The aim of the field experiments is to test the linear relationship between different hydraulic parameters and soil detachment. For example correlations between shear stress, unit length shear force, stream power, unit stream power and effective stream power and the detachment rate does not reveal a single parameter which consistently displays the best correlation. More importantly, the best fit does not only vary from one experiment to another, but even between distinct measurement points. Different processes in rill erosion are responsible for the changing correlations. However, not all these procedures are considered in soil erosion models. Hence, hydraulic parameters alone are not sufficient to predict detachment rates. They predict the fluvial incising in the rill's bottom, but the main sediment sources are not considered sufficiently in its equations. The results of this study show that there is still a lack of understanding of the physical processes underlying soil erosion. Exerted forces, soil stability and its expression, the abstraction of the detachment and transport processes in shallow flowing water remain still subject of unclear description and dependence.
本研究展示了实验结果与数值模型中假设之间的比较。现场实验的目的是测试不同水力参数与土壤剥蚀之间的线性关系。例如,剪切应力、单位长度剪切力、水流功率、单位水流功率和有效水流功率与剥蚀率之间的相关性并没有显示出一个始终表现出最佳相关性的单一参数。更重要的是,最佳拟合不仅因实验而异,甚至在不同的测量点之间也不同。细沟侵蚀中的不同过程导致相关性发生变化。然而,并非所有这些过程都被考虑在土壤侵蚀模型中。因此,水力参数本身不足以预测剥蚀率。它们可以预测在细沟底部的河流侵蚀,但在其方程中并没有充分考虑到主要的泥沙来源。本研究的结果表明,人们对土壤侵蚀的物理过程仍然缺乏了解。作用力、土壤稳定性及其表达、浅水流中剥蚀和输移过程的抽象仍然是不明确的描述和依赖的主题。