• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

报告在免于支付系统(PPS)的癌症医院的妇科肿瘤学计划中的质量措施:一项具有挑战性的倡议的早期洞察。

Reporting of quality measures in gynecologic oncology programs at Prospective Payment System (PPS)-Exempt Cancer Hospitals: an early glimpse into a challenging initiative.

机构信息

The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Sep;130(3):403-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.05.026. Epub 2013 May 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.05.026
PMID:23718934
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Affordable Care Act mandates the Prospective Payment System (PPS)-Exempt Cancer Hospitals Quality Reporting program. These 11 hospitals (which are paid fee-for-service rather than on a DRG system) began reporting measures (2 general safety, 2 breast, 1 colon) in 2013. Given this reporting mandate, we set out to determine whether the PPS-exempt gynecologic oncology programs could identify quality measures specific to the care of our patients.

METHODS

A list of 12 quality measures specific to gynecologic oncology was created (from sources including the National Quality Forum and the SGO). Measures already in use were not included. The list was ranked by the gynecologic oncology program directors at the PPS-exempt hospitals. Descriptive statistics (including mean and SD for rankings) were utilized.

RESULTS

Despite mandatory reporting of quality measures for PPS-exempt cancer hospitals, little consensus exists regarding specific gynecologic cancer measures. Documentation of debulking status, cancer survival, and offering minimally invasive surgery (for endometrial cancer) and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (for ovarian cancer) are important, but with widely variable responses (when ranked 1-12, standard deviations are 2-3). General issues regarding adherence to guidelines for the use of GCSF, documentation of functional status, and tracking of patient satisfaction scores were ranked the lowest. Three of the directors reported that their compensation is partially linked to quality outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

There is wide variability in ranking of quality measures, and may relate to provider or institutional factors. Despite the mandatory reporting in PPS-exempt cancer hospitals, work remains to define gynecologic cancer quality measures.

摘要

目的

平价医疗法案要求前瞻性支付系统(PPS)豁免癌症医院质量报告计划。这 11 家医院(按服务收费,而不是按疾病诊断相关分组系统收费)于 2013 年开始报告措施(2 项一般安全性、2 项乳房、1 项结肠)。鉴于这一报告要求,我们着手确定 PPS 豁免妇科肿瘤学计划是否能够确定针对我们患者护理的具体质量措施。

方法

创建了一份 12 项特定于妇科肿瘤学的质量措施清单(来自包括国家质量论坛和 SGO 在内的来源)。未包括已经在使用的措施。该清单由 PPS 豁免医院的妇科肿瘤学项目主任进行排名。使用描述性统计(包括排名的平均值和标准差)。

结果

尽管对 PPS 豁免癌症医院的质量措施进行了强制性报告,但对于具体的妇科癌症措施几乎没有共识。记录减瘤状态、癌症生存情况以及提供微创手术(用于子宫内膜癌)和腹腔内化疗(用于卵巢癌)很重要,但反应差异很大(排名 1-12 时,标准差为 2-3)。关于遵循 GCSF 使用指南、记录功能状态和跟踪患者满意度评分的一般问题排名最低。三位主任报告说,他们的报酬部分与质量结果挂钩。

结论

质量措施的排名差异很大,可能与提供者或机构因素有关。尽管 PPS 豁免癌症医院进行了强制性报告,但仍需努力定义妇科癌症质量措施。

相似文献

1
Reporting of quality measures in gynecologic oncology programs at Prospective Payment System (PPS)-Exempt Cancer Hospitals: an early glimpse into a challenging initiative.报告在免于支付系统(PPS)的癌症医院的妇科肿瘤学计划中的质量措施:一项具有挑战性的倡议的早期洞察。
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Sep;130(3):403-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.05.026. Epub 2013 May 26.
2
Medicare program; hospital inpatient prospective payment systems for acute care hospitals and the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and Fiscal Year 2014 rates; quality reporting requirements for specific providers; hospital conditions of participation; payment policies related to patient status. Final rules.医疗保险计划;急性病医院的医院住院病人前瞻性支付系统、长期护理医院前瞻性支付系统及2014财年费率;特定提供者的质量报告要求;医院参与条件;与患者状态相关的支付政策。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2013 Aug 19;78(160):50495-1040.
3
Gynecologic oncology quality measures: what really matters?妇科肿瘤学质量指标:真正重要的是什么?
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Sep;130(3):401-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.07.096.
4
Medicare program; hospital inpatient prospective payment systems for acute care hospitals and the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and fiscal year 2013 rates; hospitals' resident caps for graduate medical education payment purposes; quality reporting requirements for specific providers and for ambulatory surgical centers. final rule.医疗保险计划;急症医院的住院病人前瞻性支付系统、长期护理医院前瞻性支付系统及2013财年费率;用于研究生医学教育支付目的的医院住院医生上限;特定提供者及门诊手术中心的质量报告要求。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2012 Aug 31;77(170):53257-750.
5
Improving cancer care through public reporting of meaningful quality measures.通过有意义的质量指标的公开报告来改善癌症护理。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):664-72. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0089.
6
Society of Gynecologic Oncology Clinical Outcomes Registry: From small beginnings come great things.妇科肿瘤学会临床结局登记处:小处着手,成就大事。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Mar;148(3):439-444. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.01.021. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
7
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: what every provider of gynecologic oncology care should know.《患者保护与平价医疗法案:每位妇科肿瘤学护理提供者都应该了解的内容》。
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Jun;129(3):606-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.036. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
8
Improving quality and decreasing cost in gynecologic oncology care. Society of gynecologic oncology recommendations for clinical practice.提高妇科肿瘤护理质量并降低成本。妇科肿瘤学会临床实践建议。
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 May;137(2):280-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.02.021. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
9
Society of Gynecologic Oncology meeting highlights progress.妇科肿瘤学会会议强调了进展。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Apr 6;103(7):533-4. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr121. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
10
Comparison of Hospitals Affiliated With PPS-Exempt Cancer Centers, Other Hospitals Affiliated With NCI-Designated Cancer Centers, and Other Hospitals That Provide Cancer Care.与PPS豁免癌症中心相关的医院、其他与美国国立癌症研究所指定癌症中心相关的医院以及其他提供癌症护理的医院的比较。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Aug 1;179(8):1043-1051. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0914.

引用本文的文献

1
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores and gynecologic oncology surgical outcomes.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的医院消费者评估医疗保健提供者和系统(HCAHPS)评分与妇科肿瘤外科手术结果。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Aug;154(2):405-410. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
2
Defining the value framework for prostate brachytherapy using patient-centered outcome metrics and time-driven activity-based costing.使用以患者为中心的结果指标和基于时间驱动作业成本法来定义前列腺近距离放射治疗的价值框架。
Brachytherapy. 2016 May-Jun;15(3):274-282. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
3
Evaluation of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Universal Surgical Risk Calculator for a gynecologic oncology service.
针对妇科肿瘤服务评估国家外科质量改进计划通用外科风险计算器。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Mar;25(3):512-20. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000378.