Marieb M A, Beller G A, Gibson R S, Lerman B B, Kaul S
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville 22908.
Am J Cardiol. 1990 Jul 15;66(2):172-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90583-m.
Because there is controversy regarding the clinical relevance of exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias, we analyzed their significance in 383 patients who had undergone both exercise thallium-201 stress-testing and cardiac catheterization. Two-hundred twenty-one patients (58%) had no exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias while 162 (42%) did. There was no difference between patients with and without exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias in terms of previous myocardial infarction (p = 0.61), incidence of fixed thallium-201 defects (0.06), number of diseased vessels (p = 0.09) and resting left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.06). In contrast, evidence of provocable ischemia (redistribution on thallium-201 and ST-segment depression on the electrocardiogram) were more likely (p less than 0.02) to be seen in patients with exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias. Discriminant function analysis revealed that these 2 variables best separated patients with and without exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias. In a 4- to 8-year follow-up, 89 patients had adverse cardiac events. Of these 89, there were 41 deaths, 9 nonfatal myocardial infarctions and 39 coronary revascularization procedures performed later than 3 months after catheterization. Patients with exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias were more likely (p = 0.01) to have these events than those without these arrhythmias. Moreover, these arrhythmias provided independent prognostic information beyond that provided by the thallium-201 stress test and coronary angiography. We conclude that exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias are associated with exercise-induced ischemia and provide prognostic information which adds marginally to that provided by other noninvasive and invasive parameters in ambulatory patients being evaluated for chest pain.
由于运动诱发的室性心律失常的临床相关性存在争议,我们分析了383例同时接受运动铊-201负荷试验和心脏导管检查的患者中该心律失常的意义。221例患者(58%)没有运动诱发的室性心律失常,而162例(42%)有。有或没有运动诱发室性心律失常的患者在既往心肌梗死方面(p = 0.61)、固定铊-201缺损发生率(0.06)、病变血管数量(p = 0.09)和静息左心室射血分数(p = 0.06)方面没有差异。相比之下,运动诱发室性心律失常的患者更有可能(p小于0.02)出现可诱发的心肌缺血证据(铊-201再分布和心电图ST段压低)。判别函数分析显示,这两个变量最能区分有或没有运动诱发室性心律失常的患者。在4至8年的随访中,89例患者发生了不良心脏事件。在这89例患者中,有41例死亡,9例非致命性心肌梗死,39例在导管检查后3个月以上进行了冠状动脉血运重建手术。有运动诱发室性心律失常的患者比没有这些心律失常的患者更有可能(p = 0.01)发生这些事件。此外,这些心律失常提供了独立的预后信息,超出了铊-201负荷试验和冠状动脉造影所提供的信息。我们得出结论,运动诱发的室性心律失常与运动诱发的心肌缺血相关,并提供预后信息,在评估胸痛的门诊患者中,该信息比其他非侵入性和侵入性参数所提供的信息略有增加。