Barsanti Sara, Nuti Sabina
Istituto di Management, Laboratorio Management e Sanità, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2014 Jul-Sep;29(3):e233-46. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2195. Epub 2013 May 30.
The main objective of this paper is to describe how indicators of the equity of access to health care according to socioeconomic conditions may be included in a performance evaluation system (PES) in the regional context level and in the planning and strategic control system of healthcare organisations. In particular, the paper investigates how the PES adopted, in the experience of the Tuscany region in Italy, indicators of vertical equity over time. Studies that testify inequality of access to health services often remain just a research output and are not used as targets and measurements in planning and control systems. After a brief introduction to the concept of horizontal and vertical equity in health care systems and equity measures in PES, the paper describes the 'equity process' by which selected health indicators declined by socioeconomic conditions were shared and used in the evaluation of health care institutions and in the CEOs' rewarding system, and subsequently analyses the initial results. Results on the maternal and child path and the chronicity care path not only show improvements in addressing health care inequalities, but also verify whether the health system responds appropriately to different population groups.
本文的主要目的是描述如何将根据社会经济状况衡量的医疗保健可及性公平指标纳入区域层面的绩效评估系统(PES)以及医疗保健组织的规划和战略控制系统。特别是,本文研究了意大利托斯卡纳地区在实践中采用的绩效评估系统如何随时间推移纳入纵向公平指标。证明医疗服务可及性不平等的研究往往仅停留在研究成果层面,未被用作规划和控制系统中的目标及衡量标准。在简要介绍医疗保健系统中的横向和纵向公平概念以及绩效评估系统中的公平衡量指标后,本文描述了“公平过程”,即按社会经济状况筛选出的健康指标如何在医疗保健机构评估和首席执行官奖励系统中得以共享和应用,随后分析了初步结果。母婴健康路径和慢性病护理路径的结果不仅显示在解决医疗保健不平等问题上有所改善,还验证了卫生系统是否对不同人群做出了适当反应。