• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

驾驶时间影响医院选择:意大利盆腔器官脱垂手术的选择模型。

Driving time drives the hospital choice: choice models for pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Italy.

机构信息

Institute of Management, MeS (Management and Health) Laboratory, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Via San Zeno 2, 56127, Pisa, Italy.

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Dec;24(9):1575-1586. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01563-6. Epub 2023 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-022-01563-6
PMID:36630004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9833017/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Italian healthcare jurisdiction promotes patient mobility, which is a major determinant of practice variation, thus being related to the equity of access to health services. We aimed to explore how travel times, waiting times, and other efficiency- and quality-related hospital attributes influenced the hospital choice of women needing pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery in Tuscany, Italy.

METHODS

We obtained the study population from Hospital Discharge Records. We duplicated individual observations (n = 2533) for the number of Tuscan hospitals that provided more than 30 POP interventions from 2017 to 2019 (n = 22) and merged them with the hospitals' list. We generated the dichotomous variable "hospital choice" assuming the value one when hospitals where patients underwent surgery coincided with one of the 22 hospitals. We performed mixed logit models to explore between-hospital patient choice, gradually adding the women's features as interactions.

RESULTS

Patient choice was influenced by travel more than waiting times. A general preference for hospitals delivering higher volumes of interventions emerged. Interaction analyses showed that poorly educated women were less likely to choose distant hospitals and hospitals providing greater volumes of interventions compared to their counterpart. Women with multiple comorbidities more frequently chose hospitals with shorter average length of stay.

CONCLUSION

Travel times were the main determinants of hospital choice. Other quality- and efficiency-related hospital attributes influenced hospital choice as well. However, the effect depended on the socioeconomic and clinical background of women. Managers and policymakers should consider these findings to understand how women behave in choosing providers and thus mitigate equity gaps.

摘要

目的

意大利的医疗保健管辖范围促进了患者的流动性,这是实践差异的主要决定因素,因此与获得医疗服务的公平性有关。我们旨在探讨旅行时间、等待时间和其他与效率和质量相关的医院属性如何影响意大利托斯卡纳地区需要盆腔器官脱垂(POP)手术的女性对医院的选择。

方法

我们从医院出院记录中获得了研究人群。我们为 2017 年至 2019 年提供超过 30 次 POP 干预的托斯卡纳医院数量(n=22)复制了个体观察(n=2533),并将其与医院名单合并。我们假设当患者接受手术的医院与 22 家医院中的一家相同时,将医院选择赋值为 1。我们进行了混合 Logit 模型分析,以探索医院间患者选择,并逐步将女性特征作为交互项加入。

结果

患者选择更多地受到旅行时间的影响,而不是等待时间。对提供更高手术量的医院普遍存在偏好。交互分析表明,受教育程度较低的女性选择距离较远的医院和提供更多手术量的医院的可能性较小。患有多种合并症的女性更频繁地选择平均住院时间较短的医院。

结论

旅行时间是医院选择的主要决定因素。其他与质量和效率相关的医院属性也影响医院选择。然而,这种影响取决于女性的社会经济和临床背景。管理者和政策制定者应考虑这些发现,以了解女性在选择提供者时的行为,从而减轻公平差距。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9c5/10550861/2bf7fc8e1766/10198_2022_1563_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9c5/10550861/b65a3b86e7ff/10198_2022_1563_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9c5/10550861/2bf7fc8e1766/10198_2022_1563_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9c5/10550861/b65a3b86e7ff/10198_2022_1563_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9c5/10550861/2bf7fc8e1766/10198_2022_1563_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Driving time drives the hospital choice: choice models for pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Italy.驾驶时间影响医院选择:意大利盆腔器官脱垂手术的选择模型。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Dec;24(9):1575-1586. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01563-6. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
2
Determinants of women's preferences for surgical versus conservative management for pelvic organ prolapse: a survey-based study from Italy.女性对盆腔器官脱垂行手术与保守治疗偏好的决定因素:来自意大利的一项基于调查的研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 24;14(7):e084034. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084034.
3
Regional practice variation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Tuscany, Italy: a retrospective cohort study on administrative health data.意大利托斯卡纳地区盆腔器官脱垂手术的区域实践差异:基于行政健康数据的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 7;13(3):e068145. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068145.
4
Women's choices of hospital for breast cancer surgery in Italy: Quality and equity implications.意大利女性选择乳腺癌手术医院:质量和公平影响。
Health Policy. 2023 May;131:104781. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104781. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
5
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
6
Do patients prefer mesh or anterior colporrhaphy for primary correction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a labelled discrete choice experiment.在原发性阴道前壁脱垂矫正中,患者更倾向于使用网片还是前路阴道修补术:一项标记离散选择实验。
BJOG. 2015 May;122(6):873-880. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12924. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
7
Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.盆腔器官脱垂手术的围手术期干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 19;8(8):CD013105. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013105.
8
Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs.手术干预治疗子宫脱垂和阴道顶端脱垂:两项 VUE RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Mar;24(13):1-220. doi: 10.3310/hta24130.
9
Prolapse surgery versus vaginal pessary in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: which factors influence the choice of treatment?脱垂手术与阴道子宫托治疗症状性盆腔器官脱垂妇女:哪些因素影响治疗选择?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Mar;299(3):773-777. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05046-7. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
10
Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data.医疗服务量与健康结果:来自系统评价及意大利医院数据评估的证据
Epidemiol Prev. 2017 Sep-Dec;41(5-6 (Suppl 2)):1-128. doi: 10.19191/EP17.5-6S2.P001.100.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of women's preferences for surgical versus conservative management for pelvic organ prolapse: a survey-based study from Italy.女性对盆腔器官脱垂行手术与保守治疗偏好的决定因素:来自意大利的一项基于调查的研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 24;14(7):e084034. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084034.
2
Regional practice variation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Tuscany, Italy: a retrospective cohort study on administrative health data.意大利托斯卡纳地区盆腔器官脱垂手术的区域实践差异:基于行政健康数据的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 7;13(3):e068145. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068145.

本文引用的文献

1
Hospital competition in a national health service: Evidence from a patient choice reform.在国家卫生服务体系中进行医院竞争:来自患者选择改革的证据。
J Health Econ. 2021 Sep;79:102509. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102509. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
2
The Impact of New Surgical Techniques on Geographical Unwarranted Variation: The Case of Benign Hysterectomy.新手术技术对良性子宫切除术的地理不合理差异的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 22;18(13):6722. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136722.
3
The impact of quality on hospital choice. Which information affects patients' behavior for colorectal resection or knee replacement?
质量对医院选择的影响。哪些信息会影响患者接受结直肠切除术或膝关节置换术的行为?
Health Care Manag Sci. 2021 Mar;24(1):185-202. doi: 10.1007/s10729-020-09540-2. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
4
Prediction of hospital visits for the general inpatient care using floating catchment area methods: a reconceptualization of spatial accessibility.使用浮动集水区方法预测普通住院患者的住院次数:对空间可达性的重新概念化。
Int J Health Geogr. 2020 Jul 27;19(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12942-020-00223-3.
5
Laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for apical and anterior pelvic organ prolapse: A prospective double center study.腹腔镜下网片侧方悬吊术治疗中重度盆腔器官脱垂(前、中盆腔):一项前瞻性的双中心研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Jan;244:16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.10.026. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
6
Subjective and objective quality and choice of hospital: Evidence from maternal care services in Germany.医院的主观和客观质量与选择:来自德国产妇护理服务的证据。
J Health Econ. 2019 Dec;68:102229. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102229. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
7
Advances in surgical strategies for prolapse.脱垂手术策略的进展。
Climacteric. 2019 Feb;22(1):60-64. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2018.1543266.
8
Role of robotic surgery on pelvic floor reconstruction.机器人手术在盆底重建中的作用。
Minerva Ginecol. 2019 Feb;71(1):4-17. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.18.04331-9. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
9
Real-World Evidence: Promise and Peril For Medical Product Evaluation.真实世界证据:医疗产品评估的希望与风险
P T. 2018 Aug;43(8):464-472.
10
Free to Choose? Reform, Choice, and Consideration Sets in the English National Health Service.自由选择?英国国民医疗服务体系中的改革、选择与考量集
Am Econ Rev. 2016 Nov;106(11):3521-57. doi: 10.1257/aer.20121532.