Suppr超能文献

哪些功能方面可以解释长期下腰痛患者康复后对变化的感受?

What functional aspects explain patients' impression of change after rehabilitation for long-lasting low back pain?

作者信息

Anderson Bodil, Lygren Hildegunn, Magnussen Liv Heide, Eide Geir Egil, Strand Liv Inger

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Physiother Res Int. 2013 Sep;18(3):167-77. doi: 10.1002/pri.1548. Epub 2013 May 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physical tests and self-report measures are being used to measure physical functioning. The latter tends to be preferred in intervention studies.

PURPOSE

To examine whether the patients' global impression of change (PGIC) after rehabilitation was explained by change in pain, daily functioning, fear-avoidance of activities and various physical aspects, expecting contribution primarily by the self-reported measures.

METHODS

A test-retest design, within a prospective cohort study of patients with long-lasting low back pain. 96 patients were consecutively recruited from an outpatient spine clinic, assessed by three self-report questionnaires and seven physical tests at inclusion and after 3.5 weeks of multidisciplinary treatment. With PGIC as the dependent variable, linear regression analyses of all variables were performed. The study was approved by the Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics and the National Data Inspectorate of Norway.

RESULTS

In unadjusted analysis, change in pain, daily functioning and change in six physical tests contributed to the explained variance (R2: 6-24%). In the adjusted analysis, only pain and back endurance strength contributed (adjusted R2: 48%). In the final backward stepwise blockwise analyses, daily functioning and spinal mobility were also found to contribute to the explained variance (R2: 48%). The time span of 3.5 weeks of training is too short to give a lasting effect, but the contribution to explained variance of PGIC of self-report measures and physical tests were the focus of this study, not the effect of training.

CONCLUSION

Most measures demonstrated change that was of significance to the patients after rehabilitation. Change in spinal mobility and back strength assessed by physical tests contributed to explain the patients' impression of change after controlling for change in pain and daily life functioning and may seem important to assess in addition to the self-report measures in intervention studies.

摘要

背景

身体测试和自我报告测量方法正被用于评估身体功能。在干预研究中,后者往往更受青睐。

目的

探讨康复后患者的整体变化印象(PGIC)是否可由疼痛、日常功能、活动恐惧回避以及各种身体方面的变化来解释,预计自我报告测量方法将起主要作用。

方法

在一项针对持续性下腰痛患者的前瞻性队列研究中采用重测设计。从一家门诊脊柱诊所连续招募了96名患者,在纳入研究时以及经过3.5周的多学科治疗后,通过三份自我报告问卷和七项身体测试进行评估。以PGIC作为因变量,对所有变量进行线性回归分析。该研究获得了挪威地区医学研究伦理委员会和国家数据监察局的批准。

结果

在未调整分析中,疼痛变化、日常功能变化以及六项身体测试的变化对可解释方差有贡献(R²:6 - 24%)。在调整分析中,只有疼痛和背部耐力力量有贡献(调整后R²:48%)。在最终的向后逐步分组分析中,还发现日常功能和脊柱活动度对可解释方差有贡献(R²:48%)。3.5周的训练时间跨度太短,无法产生持久效果,但本研究的重点是自我报告测量方法和身体测试对PGIC可解释方差的贡献,而非训练效果。

结论

大多数测量指标显示出康复后对患者具有重要意义的变化。在控制了疼痛和日常生活功能变化后,通过身体测试评估的脊柱活动度和背部力量变化有助于解释患者的变化印象,并且在干预研究中,除自我报告测量方法外,评估这些指标可能也很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验